Đăng ký Đăng nhập
Trang chủ Giáo dục - Đào tạo Cao đẳng - Đại học Người đại diện của đương sự trong tố tụng dân sự việt nam hiện nay tt tiếng anh...

Tài liệu Người đại diện của đương sự trong tố tụng dân sự việt nam hiện nay tt tiếng anh

.PDF
27
33
67

Mô tả:

VIETNAM ACADEMY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES GRADUATE ACADEMY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES L TRAN THI QUYNH CHAU REPRESENTATIVE OF LITIGANT IN CIVIL PROCEEDING IN VIET NAM Major: Economic Law Major code: 9.38.01.07 SUMMARY OF THE DOCTORAL DISSERTATION IN LAW HaNoi - 2019 The dissertation completed at Graduate Academy of Social Sciences, Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Duong Anh Son Reviewer 1: Prof. Dr. Hoang The Lien Reviewer 2: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bui Thi Huyen Reviewer 3: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nguyen Thi Que Anh The dissertation will be defended at Graduate Academy Level Council of dissertation assessment at Graduate Academy of Social Sciences, Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, 477 Nguyen Trai, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi. Time: ………… date ………. month …… …year 2019 The dissertation may be found at: - Vietnam National Library; Graduate Academy of Social Sciences Library INTRODUTION 1. Rationale of the dissertation In recent years, representatives of the litigants in civil proceedings have gradually claimed their position and role in the proceedings, increasingly proved to be one of the indispensable components in Civil Procedure. The proper determination of the role of the litigant's representatives in civil procedures is a necessary and important work. The activities of the litigants' representatives in civil procedures impact not only the activities of the participants in procedures but also the activities of proceeding authorities, contributing to the promotion of social democracy and progress, perfecting and defending socialist legislation. The representative of the litigant is a person involving in civil procedures and acting on behalf of the involved party to implement his/her procedural rights and obligations to protect his/her rights and interests. Participation in the proceedings of the litigant's representative in civil proceedures play a significant role in resolving civil cases, especially cases in which the involved parties cannot implement their rights and obligations themselves. According to the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), there are 3 types of representatives of the involved parties: the representatives at law, the proxy representatives and representatives appointed by the Court. The participation in civil procedure of the litigant's representative is important to protect the lawful rights and interests of the litigant as well as finding the truth in civil cases. Recent years’ reality shows that it is very necessary to prescribe a "representative" in procedures, in order to ensure that the oral argument takes place in accordance with the law to properly protect the lawful rights and interests of the involved parties. However, over the past time, the provisions on "representative" in procedures are not only not specific enough but also lack of uniformity, affecting procedural activities of many proceeding authorities, leading to unguaranteed lawful rights and interests of the litigants. 1 Provisions on representative of the involved parties in civil procedures were first introduced in Ordinance No. 27-LCT/HDNN8 on Procedures for resolving civil cases issued by the State Council on December 7th, 1989 and continued to be prescribed in the Civil Procedure Code 2004. Most recently, the regulations on representative of litigants are stipulated in the Civil Procedure Code 2015. However, practice shows that the provisions of the law have revealed some inadequacies as many regulations are not clear or appropriate while there are som necessary issues not yet codified. In addition, there are still a lot of difficulties in applying provisions of law in real life. Stemming from the role of the litigant's representative, the reality of the law and the practice of applying the law, it is essential to study the litigant’s representative in civil proceedures. On the other hand, the provisions of the law as well as research on representatives in civil procedures are still incomplete, and it is necessary to conduct a study which is more fulfilling. Comprehensive study and assessment of the provisions of the law related to the representative of the litigants in civil procedures, practical assessment of the application of law in civil proceedings, from which to propose solutions to improve the law and improve the effectiveness of the above-mentioned issues, improve the efficiency of legal proceedings in the Court, better protect the rights and interests of the parties to the dispute. For the abovementioned reasons, the author decide to choose the topic: "Representative of litigant in Vietnam civil procedures at present" in order to partially contribute to solving the above issues. 2. Purpose and duty of the thesis 2.1. Purpose The dissertation's purpose is to contribute to supplementing and completing the legal and scientific theoretical system on representative of the involved parties in civil procedures; assess the provisions of current law and law application practice; henceforth, 2 propose specific solutions to contribute to enhancing the law governing the representative of the litigant - an integral part of civil procedure. 2.2. Duty To achieve the above-mentioned objectives, the thesis's duty is specified as follows: - Getting an overview of the research carried out on the topic before to clarify the points to be inherited and the ones that need to be further studied in the thesis; clarify the theoretical basis of the thesis’s topic; - Studying, analyzing and clarifying legal and theoretical issues on the representative of the involved parties in civil procedures; - Analyzing and assessing the current situation of Vietnamese law and law application practice on representative of the involved parties in civil procedures; indicate the limits and inadequacies in practice of law and in the reality of solving civil cases relating to the involved parties' representatives participating in civil procedures; - On the basis of theoretical and practical research, the thesis proposes orientations and some solutions to improve the law as well as improve the efficiency of law application on representative in civil procedures in Vietnam nowadays. 3. Subject and scope of the thesis 3.1. Subject of the thesis - Researching basic theoretical issues about the litigant's representative in civil procedures: concept, classification, bases for establishing representative relations, requirements to become a representative, term of representation, scope of representation, contents of the representative relationship, grounds for termination of the representative relationship and legal consequences of such termination. - Studying the law of some countries in the world on representation of the involved parties in civil procedures. 3 - Studying the provisions of Vietnamese law on representation of the involved parties in civil procedures. - Studying practice of applying current law provisions on representation of the involved parties in civil procedures at courts over the years. 3.2. Scope of the thesis Content: The research scope of the thesis is theoretical and practical issues of the litigant's representative in civil procedures in accordance with the civil procedure law. Space: The thesis focuses on studying Vietnamese legal system of the litigant's representative in civil procedures, as well as the practice of applying law on represetation of the litigant in civil proceedings at People's Courts in Vietnam. The study of legal experience of countries on representation in civil proceedings through secondary sources is only to clarify the legal theoretical model on this matter. Period: The thesis focuses on researching issues related to representation of the litigants in civil procedures according to the Civil Procedure Code 2015. However, the part of the thesis about law applying practice does mention cases that happened earlier. 4. The methodology and research methods of the thesis The thesis is conducted based on the philosophy of Marxism and Leninism, directly use the combination of theory and practice, general analysis, specific history and specialized research methods such as: methods of normative analysis, practical survey methods, comparative statistics, meta analysis, case studies ... 5. New scientific contributions of the thesis The thesis conducts a comprehensive and systematic study on litigant's representation in civil procedures; basic contents of the law on representation; analyes the practice of law and law application on representation in civil procedures; Hence, it proposes solutions to improve the law and improve the effectiveness of applying law on representation in civil procedures. 4 Theoretically, the thesis explains matters relating to representation in civil procedures; analyzes and gives a definition of a representative; clarifies the basic purpose of representation. The thesis explains theoretical aspects of representation in civil procedures such as: content of representation relations, bases for establishing representation relations, legal consequences of establishing and termination of representation, term and scope of representation. The thesis also shows some regulations on legal representation in a number of countries, thereby drawing lessons for Vietnam. The thesis has analyzed and objectively evaluated the current reality of law and practical application of law on representation in civil procedures in Vietnam; clarified the inadequacies, overlaps and limitations of the legal provisions on representation in protecting the interests of involved parties in civil procedures. Key contents of provisions of Vietnam law on rights and obligations of representatives, the bases as well as the legal consequences of establishing and terminating representative relations have also been systematized, analyzed, explained and clarified. Based on the theoretical and practical issues that have been clarified, the thesis proposes synchronous and scientific legal suggestions and solutions to overcome the limitations and complete the provisions of law on representation in civil procedures of Vietnam today. 6. Theoretical and practical meanings of the thesis The conclusions, proposals and recommendations given by the thesis are based on scientific and practical basis. Therefore, they can be refered to in amending and supplementing civil procedure law. At the same time, the findings of the thesis are also useful for reference in studying, researching and teaching about law on representation of the litigant in civil procedures at institutions either specialized in law training or not. 7. The structure of the thesis 5 In addition to the introduction, conclusion and references, the thesis consists of four chapters: Chapter 1: Literature review Chapter 2: Theoretical issues about litigant's representation in civil procedures. Chapter 3: Reality of law on litigant's representation in civil procedures and law application. Chapter 4: Recommendations and solutions to improve the law on representation of litigant in civil proceedings. 6 CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 1.1. Literature review 1.1.1. Research on theoretical and practical issues of law on representation 1.1.2. Research on theoretical and practical issues of law on rights and obligations of representatives in civil procedures 1.1.3. Research on reality of law and law application on representatives of the litigants in civil procedures 1.1.4. Proposals to improve the law on litigant's representatives in civil procedures of published research 1.2. Value and shortcomings of related research 1.2.1. The issues related to the thesis which have been solved Published research results on litigant's representatives have clearly indicated concepts, bases for establishment, rights and obligations, grounds for termination of representation and legal consequences of such termination. Studies have pointed out the differences between the content represented in the law in Vietnam and the laws of other countries in the world. The above works have analyzed and assessed the current practice of the provisions on representatives of the involved parties in civil procedures prescribed in Vietnamese law and proposed some solutions to enhance the role of these people. Some articles published in journals have also mentioned the experience of some countries for reference in the process of completing Vietnamese law. 1.2.2. Points that the thesis will inherit and continue to study further The author recognizes the results that the researches related to the topic have achieved, hence, the thesis will continue to research in order to inherit and develop the content of the litigant's representative in civil proceedings. 7 1.2.3. The issues that the thesis will continue to research However, the above studies have left a number of issues unexlained and this thesis will conduct a more comprehensive study of such issues as follows: Firstly, the thesis will further clarify the concept relating to the representative of litigant in civil procedures, characteristics of representative relations, classifications of representative of the litigants in civil proceedings, state the differences between representatives of the involved parties in civil procedures and in other branches of law. Secondly, the thesis will research the matter of adjusting the law on litigant's representative in civil procedures and provide overall assessment on litigant's representation in civil procedures through versions of law. Thirdly, the thesis will analyze and assess Vietnamese law’s provisions on representatives of litigants in civil procedures, point out the inadequacies, inconsistences or overlaps in Vietnamese law in comparisons with the law of some countries in the world. Fourthly, the thesis will propose more solutions to improve the effectiveness of law enforcement on representation of the involved parties in civil procedures. 1.3. Theoretical basis 1.3.1. The theories studied *The theory of representatives: Jensen and Meckling (1976) in "The theory of companies: management behavior, agent costs and ownership structure" introduced their views on representative theory. This theory may also apply to the study of litigants' representatives in civil proceedings. The reason is that, in civil procedures, in order to protect their legitimate rights and interests, litigants often perform their rights and obligations by themselves. However, in some cases, other persons may participate in the proceedings and exercise the rights and obligations of the litigants in order to protect their legal 8 rights and interests. Participants in this civil procedure are called their representatives. *Theory of ensuring human rights in legal proceedings: Ensuring human rights and civil rights is creating political, economic, social, legal and organizational prerequisites and conditions so that individuals, citizens and organizations can exercise their legitimate rights and interests recognized by law. *Theory of assuring the principle of litigation in civil procedures: In civil procedures, the principle of litigation is guaranteed for the litigants, the litigants’ representative, people protecting legitimate rights and interests of the involved parties to exercise the right to litigate from beginning to the end of a case through first-instance, appellate, cassation or reopening trial. 1.3.2. Research questions and hypotheses The first question: How is the concept, characteristics and role of the representative of the person involved in civil proceedings understood? How is the theoretical model and legal content of the representative of the person involved in civil proceedings explained and interpreted? Research hypothesis: it is necessary to conduct research in order to consistently clarify the concept of the litigant's representative in civil procedures. From the concept of the representative of the involved party in civil procedures, the characteristics of the representative, classification of the representative, and the role of the representative of the litigant in the proceedings must be indicated. The second question: How is the current situation of Vietnamese law on the representation of the litigants in civil proceedings? Through practical implementation of legal provisions on this issue, what are the limitations and obstacles? Research hypotheses: Through trying practice, the provisions on litigant's representative in civil procedures reveal some inadequacies and difficulties, leading to the ineffectiveness of proceeding activities. 9 The third question: How are the recommendations and solutions to improve the law, as well as improve the effectiveness of the implementation of the law on the representation of the litigant in current civil procedures in Vietnam found? Research hypothesis: To improve the law’s provisions as well as improve the effectiveness of applying the law on representative of litigant in civil proceedings, it is necessary to consider based on the main viewpoints and to meet the requirements of social life practice, from which to set forth goals and appropriate solutions to make amendments to the law on representatives of the involved parties in civil procedures in the future. 1.3.4. Research approach Representative of litigant in civil proceedings is a subject participating in civil procedures. However, within the scope of a research in law, clarifying the content and the role of this subject is only a premise to studying and completing legal provisions on representative of the involved parties in civil procedures. Conclusion of chapter 1. 10 Chapter 2 THEORETICAL ISSUES ABOUT LITIGANT'S REPRESENTATION IN CIVIL PROCEDURES 2.1. Overview of theory about the litigant's representative in civil procedures 2.1.1. The concept of litigants in civil proceedings and the concept of representation 2.1.1.1. Concept of litigants in civil procedures The litigants in civil proceedings are individuals, legal entities or other entities with interests in dispute or need to be identified participating in the process of resolving civil cases to protect their legitimate rights and interests. 2.1.1.2. The concept of representation Representation is the establishment, implementation of a legal act by a person, agency or organization within the scope of its representation competence. A representative is a person who, on behalf of and for the benefit of another person, enters into and performs transactions within the scope of representation authorized. 2.1.2. The concept of the representative of the involved party in civil proceedings The representative of litigant in civil proceedings is the person who takes part in civil procedures on behalf of him/ her, and exercises rights and obligations to protect his/her lawful rights and interests in civil procedures. 2.1.3. Characteristics of the litigant's representatives in civil procedures - Representative is an organization or individual with full civil procedure legal capacity. - Representatives participating in the procedural relations on the basis of their representation and exercising rights and obligations on behalf of the litigants. 11 - The rights and obligations of the representative depend on the rights and obligations of the involved parties and the nature of the representative relationship. 2.1.4. Classification of involved parties' representatives in civil procedures Based on the will of the subject, representatives are divided into two categories: - Proxy representative; - Legal representative. 2.1.5. Roles of representatives of litigants in civil procedures First, the representative acting on the litigant’s behalf exercises the rights and obligations which the litigant should have performed by himself, thereby protecting the involved parties' legitimate rights and interests. Second, the representative helps the proceeding authorities connect with the litigants in a convenient, effective way to find the truth in civil cases. 2.2. Generalizing legal arguments about litigants' representatives in civil procedures 2.2.1. Concepts and legal characteristics of the involved parties' representatives in civil procedures Firstly, the development of legal provisions on litigants 'representatives in civil procedures is conducted on the basis of the principle of the parties' right to self-determination. Secondly, the development of legal provisions on litigants' representatives in civil proceedings is conducted on the basis of ensuring the right to participate in the litigation in the Court to protect the rights and interests of the litigants. Thirdly, the development of legal provisions on the litigant's representation in civil procedures is conducted on the basis of ensuring the connection between the Civil Code and the Civil Procedure Code in stipulating about representation. 12 Fourthly, the development of legal provisions on the litigant's representation in civil proceedings comes from the requirements of procedural practice in Courts. 2.2.2. Basic contents of law on the representatives of the involved parties in civil procedures First, the provisions on requirements to become litigant's representatives in civil procedures Second, the provisions on the basis for establishing representation. Establishment of authorized representatives means the involved parties and their representatives enter into authorization transactions; Establishment of legal representative is the case in which it is obliged to have a representative of the involved party and the representative is prescribed in law. Third, the provisions on the term of representation and scope of representation. Fourth, the provisions on the rights and obligations of the person representing the litigants in civil procedures. Fifth, the provisions on termination of representation in civil procedures. Conclusion of chapter 2. 13 Chapter 3 REALITY OF LAW ON LITIGANT'S REPRESENTATION IN CIVIL PROCEDURES AND LAW APPLICATION INVIET NAM TODAY 3.1. Reality of legal provisions on representative of the litigant in civil proceedings in Vietnam today 3.1.1. Conditions to become a representative of the litigant First, identify the representative of the litigant in civil proceedings Article 85 of the CPC 2015 regulates: “The representative in civil procedures includes the legal representative and authorized representative” and refers to the provisions of the Civil Code: “The representative may be an individual, legal entity according to the Civil Code”; "The legal representative as prescribed in the Civil Code is the legal representative in civil procedures, except for the case where the legal representative right is restricted" and "The authorized representative under provisions of the Civil Code are authorized representatives in civil procedures”. Second, the subjective capacity of the person representing the litigant The 2015 CPC does not specify conditions on the subject capacity of the representative but referred to the 2015 Civil Code. Clause 3, Article 134 of the 2015 Civil Code is prescribed as follows: “The representative, if required by law, must have legal personality and/or legal capacity in accordance with the transactions that he/she enters into and performs”. For representatives being legal entities, they must have civil procedure legal personality and capacity. Third, people who are not allowed to be representatives 3.1.2. Basis for establishment of representation of the involved parties in civil procedures 14 First, legal representatives of natural persons: - The father and/or mother with respect to a minor (under 18). This is regulated by clause 1 Article 136 Civil Code 2015 and Article 69 CPC 2015. - The guardian with respect to a ward, in which the ward is a minor who has no father or mother or has no father or mother identified; minors having fathers or mothers but lost their legal capacity; fathers and mothers have difficulties in cognition and behavior control; both parents have limited legal capacity - The guardian of a person with limited cognition and behavior control is a legal representative if appointed by a court. - The person appointed by a court with respect to a person with limited legal capacity - The person appointed by a court in case where it is not able to determine the representative to be the father or the other regarding minor. Second, legal representatives of juridical persons For non-commercial legal entities, the person who is competent to be the representative is prescribed by law. A competent authority decide to appoint the head of a legal entity to be the legal representative of the legal entity. Third, the authorized representative of litigant in civil proceedings Fourth, appointing representatives in civil procedures 3.1.3. Term of representation and scope of representation in civil procedures Firstly, regarding the term of representation: the CPC 2015 does not state a time limit for representation, therfore, according to the general principle, the term of representation in civil procedures is in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code. However, it can 15 also be understood that the litigant's legal representative must perform all of the involved parties' procedural rights and obligations until the civil cases are solved. Secondly, regarding the scope of representation: The scope of representation is determined according to the reference from Article 85 of the CPC 2015 to Article 141 of the Civil Code 2015. 3.1.4. Rights and obligations of representatives Firstly, the rights and obligations of the legal representative in civil procedures. The legal representative in civil procedures shall exercise his/her civil procedural rights and obligations within the scope of his/her representation (Article 86 of the CPC 2015). Second, the rights and obligations of the authorized representative in civil procedures: In this case, the representative of the involved party takes part in the proceedings to protect the rights of the litigant who is legally capabled. The litigants themselves can also exercise their procedural rights and obligations. Therefore, the litigant's authorized representative shall only perform his/her procedural rights and obligations within the scope of authorization. Clause 2, Article 86 of the CPC 2015 states: “The authorized representative in civil procedures shall exercise his/her civil procedural rights and obligations according to the contents of the authorization document”. 3.1.5. Termination of representation in civil procedures Firstly, the provisions on termination of representation: the CPC 2015 did not specifically stipulate the termination of the status of the representative, but referred to the provisions of the Civil Code: “The representatives at law, the proxy representatives in civil procedures shall terminate their representation according to the provisions of the Civil Code". According to the provisions of Clauses 3 and 4, Article 140 of the Civil Code 2015, the termination of 16 representation is considered in two cases, corresponding to two forms of representation: termination of legal representation and termination of authorized representation. Secondly, about the legal consequences of the termination of representation: In cases where the proxy representation terminates, the involved parties or their heirs shall participate in civil procedures in person or authorize other persons to participate in the procedures according to the procedures prescribed by CPC. 3.2. Law on representative of the involved parties in civil procedures applying practice 3.2.1. The implementation of the provisions on conditions to become a representative Shortcoming in authorizing in divorce cases: Clause 4, Article 85 of the CPC 2015 provides that in divorce cases, parties cannot authorize other people to participate in the proceedings on their behalf. 3.2.2. The implementation of regulations on the establishment of representation First, determining the representative in case a branch or representative office of the enterprise participates in the proceedings Second, determining the representative in case the private enterprise’s owner participates in the proceedings Third, determining the representative in the event that the partriarch participates in the proceedings regarding the family’s assets Fourth, determining the representative in the case of households Fifth, authorization to different people makes it difficult for the Court to resolve the case 17 3.2.3. The implementation of the provisions on the term and scope of representation Firstly, regarding term of representation Secondly, the unclear content, scope of authorization make it difficult for the Court to solve cases. Thirdly, the representative exceeds the scope of authorization and handling the consequences of exceeding the scope of authorization 3.2.4. The implementation of regulations on rights and obligations of representatives 3.2.5. The implementation of the provisions on termination of representation 3.2.6. A few comments, reviews on limitations, inadequacies and their causes Conclusion of chapter 3 18
- Xem thêm -

Tài liệu liên quan