CAN THO UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
***
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using
English Collocations
B.A Thesis
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai, M.Ed
Student: Nguyen Anh Thuy
Student ID: 7062925
Class: NN0652A1
Course: 32
Can Tho, April, 2010
CAN THO UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
***
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using
English Collocations
B.A Thesis
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai, M.Ed
Student: Nguyen Anh Thuy
Student ID: 7062925
Class: NN0652A1
Course: 32
Can Tho, April, 2010
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
During conducting this thesis, I have received much help and contribution from many
people to whom I would like to express my deep gratitude.
First and foremost, I would like to show my deep gratitude to my supervisor, Ms. Le
Xuan Mai for providing me enthusiastic support, meticulous guidance and precious
advice during the time that I was doing this thesis. I could not forget her enthusiasm to
help me correct every part of the thesis and her care about my teaching practicum at
high school.
Second, my regards are respectively sent to all teachers of the English Department for
their encouragement, guidance, especially Mr. Nguyen Thu Huong, who suggested me
a useful topic of this thesis. Also, my sincere gratitude is sent to Mrs. Nguyen Thi
Phuong Hong, Mr. Nguyen Thanh Duc, Mr Huynh Trung Tin, and Mr. Hong Lu Chi
Toan. During the time I did my research, they supported me useful materials and
advice. And I would like to acknowledge Mrs. Ngo Thi Trang Thao who gave me
useful instructions on how to analyze the data using SPSS program.
Third, I would like to thank 76 English majored students from course 33. I sincerely
appreciate the helpful comments from my friends. Special thanks are for my
roommates for their supports and encouragement during the time of my study.
Last but not least, I want to warmly thank my parents for their patience while I was
away from home. Without their loving support, my thesis would not have been
completed.
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
i
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
ABSTRACT
This study examines the ability in using English Collocations of third year English
majored students at CanTho University (CTU) when studying English as a foreign
language. Investigating whether or not the misuse of English Collocations does exist,
discovering and categorizing the common Collocational mistakes, and finding out
factors influencing the use of English Collocations in the case of CTU English
majored 3rd year students are the main objective of the study. A Collocation test
comprising 28 items which was duplicated based on the test of Angkana Mongkolchai
at Srinakharinwirot University in Bangkok in Thailand, and a twenty-item
questionnaire were used as research tools. The work presents some factors that have
strong influences on the learners’ ability in using English Collocations. The problems
related to teaching methods, learning strategies and the lack of awareness of the
importance of Collocations were theoretically analyzed to lay a foundation on which
data collection and analysis were based and focused. The results of this study
revealed that the students’ knowledge of English Collocations is rather limited.
Collocational mistakes found were presented and classified into seven patterns of
Collocations as follow. The pattern verb and adverb was at the highest level
(52.63%), followed by the pattern verb and noun (52.30%), the pattern adjective and
noun (51.64%), especially the pattern adjective and preposition, and the pattern
phrasal verbs were at the same level (50.33%); next, the pattern noun and noun
(48.68%), and the pattern adverb and adjective were at lowest level (44.08%). Also,
from the analysis of data, teaching is the main factor that affects student’s ability in
using English Collocations. Together with the findings this study may be of help for
teachers and learners to choose good ways to teach and learn Collocations
effectively.
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
ii
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
TÓM LƯỢC
Bài nghiên cứu này nhằm khảo sát khả năng sử dụng Collocations (sự sắp xếp từ theo
thứ tự) của sinh viên chuyên ngành tiếng anh năm ba, trường đại học Cần Thơ. Mục
đích nghiên cứu chính của đề tài này là nghiên cứu xem liệu có tồn tại việc sử dụng
sai Collcations, tìm ra và phân loại những lỗi Collocations phổ biến, cũng như chỉ ra
những nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến khả năng sử dụng Collocations của sinh viên. Bài kiểm
tra gồm 28 câu được phỏng theo nghiên cứu của Angkana Mongkolchai ở trường Đại
học Srinakharinwirot, Bangkok Thái Lan, và bảng câu hỏi 20 câu về Collocations
được sử dụng như công cụ nghiên cứu. Nghiên cứu trình bày một số nhân tố ảnh
hưởng đến khả năng sử dụng Collocations. Những vấn đề liên quan đến phương pháp
giảng dạy, học tập và sự thiếu nhận thức về tầm quan trọng của Collocations đã được
phân tích trên cơ sở lý thuyết để làm nền tảng cho việc thu thập và phân tích số liệu.
Kết quả nghiên cứu cho thấy rằng kiến thức về Collocations của sinh viên còn khá
hạn chế. Những lỗi thường gặp về Collocations được phân theo 7 kiểu Collocations.
Kiểu động từ - trạng từ đạt mức cao nhất (52.63%), kiểu động từ - danh từ (52.30%),
kiểu tính từ - danh từ (51.64%), đặc biệt kiểu tính từ - giới từ và kiểu cụm động từ có
cùng mức độ (50.33%); tiếp đến, kiểu danh từ - danh từ (48.68%), và kiểu trạng từ tính từ ở mức thấp nhất (44.08%). Cũng từ kết quả phân tích số liệu ta nhận thấy rằng
việc giảng dạy là một nhân tố chính ảnh hưởng đến khả năng sử dụng Collocations
của sinh viên. Kết quả nghiên cứu tìm được sẽ giúp ích cho người dạy cũng như
người học trong viêc lựa chọn phương cách dạy và học Collocations sao cho hiệu
quả.
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
iii
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... i
Abstract (English version) ............................................................................................. ii
Abstract (Vietnamese version) ...................................................................................... iii
Table of contents ........................................................................................................... iv
List of tables .................................................................................................................. vi
List of figures ................................................................................................................ vi
Chapter 1: Introduction .............................................................................................. 1
1.1. Rationale ............................................................................................................ 1
1.2. Research aims .................................................................................................... 1
1.3. Research questions ............................................................................................ 1
1.4. Organization ...................................................................................................... 2
Chapter 2: Literature Review ..................................................................................... 3
A. Related Literature…………………………………………………………………...3
2.1. Definitions of Collocations ............................................................................... 3
2.2. Classification of Collocations ........................................................................... 5
2.3. Teaching of Collocations .................................................................................. 7
2.3.1. How to teach Collocations ......................................................................... 7
2.3.2. Encouraging Students to be aware of Collocations ................................... 8
2.3.3. Learners’ Problems about Collocations ..................................................... 8
2.3.4. Factors influencing performance in Collocations ...................................... 9
B. RelatedStudies ........................................................................................................ 10
Chapter 3: Research Methodology ........................................................................... 12
3.1. Research design ............................................................................................... 12
3.2. Participants ..................................................................................................... 12
3.3. Research instruments ...................................................................................... 12
3.3.1. Test ........................................................................................................ 13
3.3.2. Questionnaire .......................................................................................... 13
3.4. Procedures ....................................................................................................... 14
3.4.1. Collecting Collocation tests .................................................................... 15
3.4.2. Collecting questionnaires ........................................................................ 15
Chapter 4: Results ...................................................................................................... 16
4.1. Collocation Test Analysis ............................................................................... 16
4.2. Questionnaire Analysis ................................................................................... 21
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
iv
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
Chapter 5: Discussions and conclusions, limitations, pedagogical implications
and suggestions for further research ...................................................................... 26
5.1. Pedagogical implications ................................................................................. 26
5.2. Limitations ....................................................................................................... 26
5.3 Suggestions for further research ....................................................................... 27
5.4 Discussions and Conclusions ............................................................................ 27
References .................................................................................................................... 29
Appendices ................................................................................................................... 30
Appendix 1 ........................................................................................................ 31
Appendix 2 ........................................................................................................ 33
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
v
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
LIST OF TABLES
Table
Page
Table 3.3.1: Clusters of the questionnaire ................................................................. 14
Table 4.1.1: The minimum, maximum, mean and standard deviation of the test
scores ............................................................................................................................ 16
Table 4.1.2: Clusters of the Collocation test................................................................ 17
Table 4.1.4: Frequency of Test Scores ........................................................................ 18
Table 4.1.5: Classification of Average Score .............................................................. 19
Table 4.1.6: Classification of the informants’ Collocation ability .............................. 20
Table 4.2.1: Reliability Coefficient of the questionnaire ............................................ 21
Table 4.2.2: Descriptive statistics of the Collocation questionnaire ........................... 21
Table 4.2.4: The mean scores of each cluster .............................................................. 22
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
Figure 4.1.3: The mean scores and the standard deviation of using English
Collocations among third students at CTU .................................................................. 17
Figure 4.2.3: The total mean of the Collocation questionnaires ................................ 22
Figure 4.2.5: The mean scores and the standard deviations of each cluster ............... 23
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
vi
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
In this chapter, I would like to state the rationale, the research aims, research questions, and the
hypotheses of this research. The organization of the thesis is also included afterwards.
1.1. Rationale
Mastering English Collocations helps English Foreign Language (EFL) learners
communicate efficiently and naturally in the target language. For example, if we want
to invite someone to look at something, it’s natural to say “Take a look at this,” or
“Have a look at this”, rather than say “Get a look at this.” Unfortunately, Collocations
have not been paid an appropriate attention to in English as Foreign Language (EFL)
classrooms. Learners seem to be uncomfortable when they use Collocations; they tend
to avoid using them by switching to use a single verb. It seems to be a tendency that
the EFL users tend to say “I haven’t decided yet” rather than say “I haven’t made up
my mind yet”. This study will investigate how effectively English students at Can Tho
University (CTU) can use Collocations.
1.2. Research aims
Firstly, in this research, I want to investigate whether or not the misuse of English
Collocations does exist in the case of CTU English majored third year students. The
second purpose of the study is to discover and categorize the common Collocational
mistakes the CTU English majored 3rd year students have made. Finally, carrying out
this research, I also want to find out factors influencing the use of English
Collocations of CTU English majored 3rd year students.
1.3. Research questions:
In this study, the researcher attempts to answer the questions:
(1) What are common mistakes that CTU third year English majors make when using
English Collocations?
(2) What are common factors influencing the students’ ability on using Collocations?
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
1
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
1.4. Organization
This thesis consists of five chapters. Chapter I is the introduction to the research. The
rationale, the research aims, the research questions, the hypotheses, as well as the
organization of the thesis are introduced in this section. A report of other researchers’
ideas and statements relating to the thesis will be showed in Chapter II, Literature
Review. Chapter III, Research Methodology, presents the research design,
participants, research instruments, and procedures of the study. The next part is
Chapter IV, which is about the results or findings of the research. In this chapter, data
collected from the instruments (a Collocation test, and a questionnaire for students)
will be analyzed and synthesized. Finally, Chapter V will focus on pedagogical
implications, limitations, suggestions for further research, discussions and
conclusions.
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
2
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
In this chapter, the researcher would like to present some ideas, and insights of other researchers about
the definitions of Collocations, classifications of Collocations, teaching of Collocations and factors
influencing performance in Collocations through the studies they have done relating to the thesis.
Also, related studies are provided as the second part of this chapter.
A. Related Literature
2.1. Definitions of Collocations
In order to understand more clearly about the term Collocation, we will have a look at
this term in its origin. “The term Collocation has its origin from the Latin verb
collocare which means to set in order/to arrange” (Martynska, 2004, p.2).
Collocation has been variously defined within linguistics and language teaching:
“How words typically occur with one another” (Carter & McCarthy, 1988,
p.32). For example, in English, promise goes with make, keep, or break, as in If I
make a promise, I’ll keep it, but not with do or take.
“Collocation means a natural combination of words; it refers to the way
English words are closely associated with each other” (O’Dell & McCarthy,
2008, p.4).
“The term Collocation is used to refer to a group of words that come
together, either because they commonly occur together like take a chance, or
because the meaning of the group is not obvious from the meaning of the parts,
as with by the way or to take someone in ” (Nation, 2001, p.317).
“The co-occurrence of words which are statistically much more likely to
appear together than random chance suggests” (Woolard, 2000, p.29).
According to the Oxford Collocations Dictionary for Student of English
(2002), Collocation is a means of combing words in a language to produce
natural-sounding speech and writing.
There are two different ways to approach this issue: “frequency-based approach” and
“phraseological approach”.
First, “frequency-based approach” indicates that a Collocation is considered
the co-occurrence of words as a certain distance (Nesselhavf, 2004). In the paper
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
3
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
of Firth-A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, he first defines Collocation as “the
company words keep” (Firth, 1957, p.179). According to Hill (2002),
Collocation is about the meaning of a word and about its relationship with other
words. Besides, two “neo-Firthians” are Halliday, who is Firth’s student, and
Sinclair, who has done pioneering work in corpus linguistics have been inspired
by Firth’s ideas about the relationship between lexis and grammar. Halliday
(1966) highlights that “Collocation is the co-occurrence of two words,
independence of grammatical types and likely to take place over sentence
boundaries” (Wang, 2005, p148). Likewise, Collocations have been defined by
Sinclair as “the occurrence of two or more words within a short space of each
other in a text” (Sinclair, 1991, p.170). For Nesselhauf (2003), one of
researchers chasing the “frequency-based approach” states Collocations as “cooccurrence of all frequencies” and “a relationship between lexemes”.
Consequently, the “frequency-based approach” can be related to the fields of
Corpus Linguistics and Computational Linguistics (Gyllstad, 2007).
Second, “phraseological approach” states that Collocations are seen as a type of
word combination (Nesselhauf, 2004). Based on the viewpoint of Gyllstad
(2007), Russian phraseology influenced this approach strongly, and this can be
related to the fields of Lexicography and Language Pedagogy. Cowie and
Howarth are major representatives for this approach. Cowie (1981, as cited in
Nesselhauf, 2004) considered Collocations a type of word combination which is
an abstract combination in actual texts. Also, Lewis (1997), who is another
important representative on this side, indicates in his Implenting the Lexical
Approach, that Collocations are those combinations of words which occur
naturally with greater than random frequency. Although Collocations co-occur,
not all words which co-occur are Collocation
To sum up, as Woolard (2000) declares, there is the overlap in the number of
definitions of Collocations. Similarly, according to Nesselhauf (2004), the mixed use
of the term “Collocations” in both the sense of the “frequency-based approach” and
the “phraseological approach” was often found in the same research.
Among various definitions of Collocations, I appreciate the viewpoint of O’Dell and
McCarthy (2008): Collocations as a natural combination of words which mention the
way English words are closely associated with each other. This definition belongs to
“phraseological approach” which Collocations are seen as a type of word
combination. For example, in English, pay and attention go together, as do commit
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
4
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
and crime; blond goes with hair and heavy with rain. For another example, promise
goes with make, keep, or break, as in If I make a promise, I’ll keep it, but not with do
or take. In my opinion, it is easy to understand or follow this definition because of its
clarity and illustrating examples.
2.2. Classifications of Collocations
In one research on Collocations, Mongkolchai (2008) concludes that although
Collocations can be classified in many different ways, two frequent classifications
found are (1) lexical and grammatical Collocations and (2) unique, strong, weak and
medium-strength Collocations.
For Benson and Ilson (1986), English Collocations are categorized into two major
groups: grammatical and lexical Collocations.
1. Grammatical Collocations: Benson (1985) defines that grammatical
Collocation are the ones in which an important word (usually content word)
combines with a grammatical one. They consist of the main word (a noun, an
adjective, a verb) plus a preposition or infinitive such as apathy towards (noun +
preposition pattern), fond of (adjective + preposition pattern), in advance
(preposition + noun pattern).
2. Lexical Collocations: Benson also states lexical Collocations are the ones in
which two basically “equal” words co-occur with each other. They do not
contain prepositions or infinitives but comprise only content words. In other
words, they consist of various combinations of nouns, adjectives, verbs and
adverbs. For examples, do a course (verb + noun pattern), traffic accident (noun
+ noun pattern), argue heatedly (verb + adverb pattern).
According to Hill’s viewpoint (2000), there are four types of Collocations: unique,
strong, weak and medium-strength Collocations.
1. Unique Collocations: These are fixed and cannot be replaced by any other
words. That means they are so strong that they cannot be changed in any way
such as to and fro or foot the bill. “The meaning of some fixed Collocations
cannot be guessed from the individual words. These Collocations are called
idioms” (O’Dell & McCarthy, 2008, p.8).
2. Strong Collocations: These Collocations are strong or very strong but not
unique. Usually, strong Collocations have few other possible collocates. For
example, moved to tears or reduced to tears. “A strong Collocation is one in
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
5
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
which the words are very closely associated with each other. For example, the
adjective mitigating almost always collocates with circumstances or factors. It
rarely collocates with any other word” (O’Dell & McCarthy, 2008, p8).
3. Weak Collocations: they consist of a number of word co-occurrences and can
be easily guessed, such as a white shirt, a red shirt, a green shirt, a long shirt, a
small shirt, etc. “Weak Collocation are made up of words that collocate with a
wide range of other words” (O’Dell & McCarthy, 2008, p8).
4. Medium- strength Collocations: These Collocations are of the same meaning
as suggested by Lewis (2000). They can sometimes be weak Collocations such as
to hold a conversation and to make a mistake. In normal circumstances, learners
have already realized each individual word such as to make and a mistake but
they can be used as a single item or as a Collocation.
Similarly, Lewis (2000) classifies Collocations as follows.
1. Strong Collocations: these refer to Collocations that have a very limited
number of collocates. Most collocates are fixed, for example, rancid butter or
rancid oil.
2. Weak Collocations: these refer to Collocations that have a wide variety of
collocates; for example, many things can be long or short, cheap or expensive,
good or bad.
3. Medium-strength Collocations: these are words that always go together more
frequently than weak Collocations. Some examples are hold a meeting, carry out
a study, etc.
There are seven Collocation patterns as these following examples:
Patterns
Examples
1) adjective + noun
great reputation
2) noun + noun
traffic accident
3) verb + adverb
smile broadly
4) verb + noun
do homework
5) adjective + preposition
pleased with
6) adverb + adjective
perfectly happy
7) phrasal verbs
pass away
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
6
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
2.3. Teaching of Collocations
2.3.1. How to Teach Collocations
Wei (1999) highlights some interesting points about how to teach Collocations
The overwhelming number of Collocations: According to some rough estimates, there
are ten thousands of Collocations. For example, in Collins COBUILD English words
in use, more than 100,000 Collocations are given. Also, there are more than 70,000
Collocations listed under about 14,000 entries in the BBI Combinatory Dictionary of
English (Bahns, 1998). Obviously, Collocations are too numerous for all of them to be
taught in the classrooms. Focus needs to be placed on building students’
consciousness of how words work in combination with one another so that they can
continue developing their Collocational competence after they leave the ESL classes.
Clear and explicit presentation should be used to provide guidance in building
students’ awareness of the importance of Collocations.
Selection of words and Collocations: In deciding what to teach, it is important to
consider the frequency of words, and in selecting words, a useful source is The
Educator’s Frequency Guide (1995), the comprehensive word frequency study that
has ever been done. In teaching advanced ESL/EFL students to use English
Collocations, the teachers use the frequency guide to select some words that are
common but may be problematic for students. After selecting the words, it may also
be necessary to select meanings. For instance, the word manage, with the meaning
succeed in has much higher occurrence than the meaning be in charge of. The two
have their own distinct Collocations: the former most frequently occurs in the
structure manage to do something; the latter usually collocates with a noun that refers
to business such as a shop, a company, a restaurant, etc. In this case, learner’s
dictionaries are excellent sources of commonly used Collocations.
Techniques, activities, and exercises can be used in teaching Collocations. Actually,
there are many useful ways to approach learners. The most useful ones are interactive
and presenting challenges to students. Besides, the good exercises should be designed
to reinforce learning. Moreover, the activities need to be interactive and studentcentered to encourage students’ initiative and maximize feedback such as peer
correction, sentence making by individual or group work.
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
7
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
2.3.2. Encouraging Students to be Aware of Collocations
Collocational knowledge is an essential part of language acquisition.
“A central element of language teaching is raising students’ awareness of, and
developing their ability to chunk language successfully” (Lewis, 1993, p6).
Likewise, Ellis claims, “The acquisition can be hastened as a result of explicit
instruction or consciousness-raising” (Ellis, 1997, p133).
Besides, Hatch and Brown in “Vocabulary, Semantics and Language Education”
emphasize that the awareness of the importance of what people has a great
contribution to their success. In addition, EFL learners often fail to express their
thoughts because they are unaware of the important Collocations of a key word that is
central to their writing or utterance (Hill, 2000). Therefore, the learners’ awareness of
the importance of Collocation is also required in learning Collocation process.
Students who meet words initially with their common collocates, use them more
naturally and pronounce them better, so teachers should raise learner’ awareness of
Collocations as early as possible.
2.3.3 Learners’ Problems about Collocations
Deveci (2004) figures out some common learners’ problems about English
Collocations:
1. Have interlingual problems. For example, instead of making mistakes, learners
may misuse doing mistakes.
2. Make negative transfer from their mother tongue. For example, some
Vietnamese learners tend to use strong rain instead of heavy rain.
3. Look for general rules for Collocations that do not work for all Collocations.
For example, learners believe that the opposite of put on your coat is put off your
coat.
4. Decrease ability to use and remember appropriate Collocations when learning
words through definitions.
5. Fail to make sense of an idiom because of cultural differences.
6. Not identify Collocations as meaningful phrases when reading texts.
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
8
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
2.3.4. Factors Influencing Performance in Collocations
There are many factors influencing the use of English Collocations, but the researcher
only states three main factors: teaching, learning strategies, and students’ awareness
about the importance of Collocations.
Teaching: Collocation is arbitrary and unpredictable (Lewis, 1997). For example, it is
correct to say “to make the bed” but not “to do the bed”; “to turn on” but not” to open
the light”, etc. Obviously, it is hard for EFL learners to cope with and to produce
Collocations effectively if Collocations are not focused on and practiced. Hill states
that “Collocation should play an important part in our teaching from lesson one” (Hill,
2000, p.60). Hence, EFL teachers should observe Collocational errors of students.
When a teacher teaches new vocabulary, s/he might realize the necessity to introduce
a chunk, not a single word, so as to let learners register from the very beginning the
word being taught and its word partner/s (Conzett, 2000). For example, if a teacher
wishes to teach the word “homework”, s/he should introduce “to do homework” as a
chunk instead of letting students register in their memory only the single word,
homework. As a result, it is possible that students may be confused whether a
collocate of homework is to do or to make. Therefore, English teachers should remind
students of the correct use of Collocations and suggest the ways to students to learn
Collocations efficiently such as encouraging learners to look for certain Collocations
in a dictionary in order to draw learners’ attention to Collocations or encouraging
learners to guess the meaning of an unknown word from the context and suggest that
they look up difficult words and pay attention to the examples provided in a
dictionary.
Learning strategies: There are some researchers paying attention to Collocation
learning strategies such as Ahmed (1980), who conducts a research on vocabulary
learning strategies that learners apply. He figures out that successful learners are more
aware of what they could learn about new words, and become more conscious of
textual learning. They also pay more attention to Collocations in the context. In
contrast, less successful learners are so passive in learning. Additionally, Schoutenvan Parrern (1989) finds that the less successful students tend to neglect the context.
Moreover, contextual learning, dictionary and note-taking strategies also contribute to
their Collocation learning results.
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
9
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
Students’ Awareness about the Importance of Collocations: Students who meet
words initially with their common collocates use them far more naturally and
pronounce them better. Hatch and Brown (1995) in “Vocabulary, Semantics and
Language Education” believe that the awareness of the importance of what people do
has a great contribution to their success. Also, learning Collocations requires the
learners’ awareness of the importance of Collocation. Especially, it is more necessary
when learners study English at a high level because Collocations can help learners
communicate more effectively. As the result, teachers should emphasize the
importance of Collocations when teaching them.
B. Related Studies
In Huang’s study (2001), he investigated Taiwanese EFL students’ knowledge of
English Collocations and the Collocational errors they made. The subjects were 60
students from a college in Taiwan. The research instrument was a self-designed
Simple Completion Test that measured the subjects’ knowledge of four types of
lexical Collocations: free combinations, restricted Collocations, figurative idioms, and
pure idioms. The results indicated that, for the subjects, free combinations created the
least amount of difficulty, whereas pure idioms were the most challenging.
Additionally, they performed about equally well on restricted Collocations and
figurative idioms. In general, the subjects’ deviant answers demonstrated their
insufficient knowledge of English Collocations. It is concluded that EFL learners’
errors in Collocations can be attributed to negative L1 transfer.
In the study Collocation problems in EFL Learning, Higuchi (1999) investigated the
Collocational problems and devising exercises He conducted the research on his
Japanese students whose age was from 18 to 20. After collecting thirty sets of short
essays and personal letters, he realized that Collocation is a major problem in their
performance. Meanwhile, he recognized that the teachers should train students in
Collocation from the early stages because it is actually very difficult for the students
at high-beginning level to tackle the exercises he devised and draw rules from the
Cobuild Corpus data. He suggested the way to raise students’ consciousness of
Collocation by taking up examples with Collocation problems from the students’
texts, discussing problems and devising exercises. Moreover, to conclude his paper,
he notes that “EFL teachers, especially non-natives, should consult computer corpora
such as the Cobuild Corpus data, unbiased perspectives of the real usage of English.
Examining these data is difficult for high-beginning students, yet these activities
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
10
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
surely raise their consciousness about Collocation and lead them to gain naturalness in
this area afterwards.”
Mongkolchai (2008) was interested in investigating the level of Collocational ability
of the third year English majors at Srinakharinwirot University in Bangkok in
Thailand. This study aimed to study the ability of the third year English majors at
Srinakharinwirot University about English Collocations, studied the patterns of
Collocation used by the students, and attempted plausible explanations for the
students’ violations about English Collocations. The research instrument used to
investigate the informants’ ability of English Collocations was a test of two parts: the
first was in a sentence completion form and the second was in a multiple choice form.
The analysis based on seven patterns of Collocation on the basis of Lewis (2000)’s
strategy. The 56 item test was used as a research tool and it was conducted with 57
third-year English majors. The results showed that the students’ ability was fair with
the mean of 52.32%. The findings revealed that the informants’ ability in using noun +
noun Collocations was at the highest level (68.64%), followed by adjective + noun
(67.32%), verb + noun (55.26%), adjective + preposition (51.10%), phrasal verb
(46.05%), verb + adverb (41.67%) and adverb + adjective (36.18%) respectively, and
the problems mostly resulted from the informants’ limited knowledge of Collocation,
and their transfer of L1 to L2 Collocations. Plausible explanations were also attempted
to account for the violations.
In summary, in this section, the notion of Collocation is presented by providing an
overview of the various definitions of Collocations and the way in which Collocations
have been classified. In the next chapter, the research methodology will be presented.
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
11
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
CTU English Majored Students’ Ability in Using English Collocations
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
In this chapter, I will present (1) the research design, (2) the participants, (3) the instruments, and (4)
the procedures of the research in order to answer two research questions:
(1) What are common mistakes that Cantho University (CTU) third year English majors make when
using English Collocations?
(2) What are common factors influencing the students’ ability on using Collocations?
3.1. Research design
This research follows a descriptive design in which the ability in using English
Collocations of English majored juniors is surveyed. Moreover, discovering,
categorizing mistakes, and indicating factors influencing the use of English
Collocations of CTU English majored 3rd year students are also focused.
3.2. Participants
“ Collocation can probably be considered a more advanced type of word knowledge,
and so may be best left to higher-level students who are enhancing and consolidating
vocabulary that has already been partially learned” (Schmitt, 2000, p.86). That is the
reason the researcher wants to choose 76 English majored students from course 33
who have had the input of Collocations. Almost these advanced students have learnt
semantics in which a lot of Collocations are taught. Furthermore, all of them have
studied the same English program in the university. In other words, third year students
are supposed to be advanced students and acquire enough linguistic knowledge about
Collocations, so they are suitable participants to my research. The participants’ ages
are not much different, commonly from 20 to 21.
3.3. Research instruments
In this study, a Collocation test and a questionnaire are employed as two kinds of
instruments.
Instructor: Le Xuan Mai
12
Nguyen Anh Thuy - 7062925
- Xem thêm -