Đăng ký Đăng nhập
Trang chủ Phân tích diễn ngôn phê phán các văn bản báo chí tiếng anh về biến đổi khí hậu...

Tài liệu Phân tích diễn ngôn phê phán các văn bản báo chí tiếng anh về biến đổi khí hậu

.PDF
24
200
145

Mô tả:

VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES FACULTY OF POST-GRADUATE STUDIES  LƯU THỊ KIM NHUNG A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH MEDIA TEXTS ON CLIMATE CHANGE A thesis submitted to the University of Languages and International Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Field: English Linguistics Code: 62 22 15 01 Hanoi, 2016 VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES FACULTY OF POST-GRADUATE STUDIES  LƯU THỊ KIM NHUNG A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH MEDIA TEXTS ON CLIMATE CHANGE A thesis submitted to the University of Languages and International Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Field: English Linguistics Code: 62 22 15 01 Supervisors: Ha Cam Tam, Ph.D. Tran Xuan Diep, Asso. Prof. Ph.D. Hanoi, 2016 Abstract This study critically analyzed how the power relation between the developed and developing countries as well as the ideologies about these countries‟ responsibilities for climate change were discursively constructed in The Independent and The New York Times’ coverage of the Conferences of the Parties to the UNFCCC between 2004 and 2013. The method of analysis was a qualitative critical discourse analysis with the support of corpus techniques. The findings from the study showed that although the altering but consistent ideologies were struggling with each other, they were all important. Three main ideologies were decoded in response to the research questions. First, both unity and conflict existed in the power relation between the developed and developing countries at the global climate conferences, with the heavier weight on the conflict. Second, the developed countries seemed reluctant and indifferent towards their responsibility for climate change. Third, the developing countries were required to take responsibility for climate change due to their rapid growth but they still demanded aid from the developed countries. Consequently, no consensus could be reached on a common framework for climate change, and the lengthy process of global climate conferences yielded nothing but confusion and delayed action. The linguistic features of lexical choice, lexical relation, metaphor, passivization, nominalization and modality were found ideologically invested in the newspapers‟ portrayal of the power relation and ideologies. Also, the ideologies and the language features that conveyed these ideologies were influenced by the two media outlets‟ political commitments, news values, news agenda, and the socio-economic and historical background that embedded the discourse. All in all, the media bolstered the asymmetrical power nexus and the ideologies about the responsibilities for climate change in the interest of the developed nations. i Acknowledgements First and foremost, I am especially indebted to my supervisors, Doctor Ha Cam Tam and Associate Professor Tran Xuan Diep, for their challenging questions, immeasurable guidance and support through every stage of my PhD journey so far. I do really appreciate their astute advice, kind encouragement and insightful feedback on my work. I would like to extend my sincerest thanks to Professor Nguyen Hoa, Professor Hoang Van Van, Associate Professor Le Hung Tien, Professor Nguyen Quang, who, in one way or another, have inspired me into the field of linguistics in general and critical discourse analysis in particular; to Doctor Huynh Anh Tuan, Associate Professor Ngo Huu Hoang, Associate Professor Nguyen Van Do, and numerous other lecturers at University of Languages and International Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi for their immensely helpful guidance and support during my study. I would also like to thank the Faculty of Postgraduate Studies, University of Languages and International Studies, and all its staff members for their constant supply of information and advice on stages of my study; my fellow graduate students who have built such a pleasant community to be part of. I am really grateful to my colleagues at Faculty of English in particular, at Hanoi National University of Education in general, for supporting me throughout my study. My final but definitely not least thanks go to my beloved big family for their unconditional support all along the way. I am particularly indebted to my late father for his absolute confidence in my learning capacity and my devoted mother for guiding me into this field of study since my very early years in life. A special thank goes to my husband for showing his continuing concern during my studies and beyond. Ultimately, a most loving thank to my son and daughter for their always being proud of their mom, and for always being there to remind me of the real significance in life. ii ONTENTS Declaration ...................................................................................................................i Abstract ........................................................................................................................i Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... ii List of Tables and Figures ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. List of Abbreviations................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. iii INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... CLXXII 1. Rationale for the study ................................................................................ CLXXII 2. Aim and objectives of the study ................................................................ CLXXIV 3. Research questions ...................................................................................... CLXXV 4. Significance of the study ............................................................................. CLXXV 5. Contextual background ............................................................................. CLXXVI Social context ................................................................................................ CLXXVI Discursive practices .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 6. Methodological considerations ............................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 7. Scope of the study ................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 8. Structure of the thesis ............................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW .............. Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.1 Critical Discourse Analysis ................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.1.1 Basic notions in CDA....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.1.2 Major tenets in CDA ........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.1.3 CDA as a Conceptual Framework and Methodology .... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.1.4 Critiques of CDA ............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.2 Corpus techniques in CDA.................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3 Previous research on climate change discourse .. Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3.1 Content analysis of media discourse on global warming and/or climate change ................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. iii 1.3.2 Discourse analysis of media discourse on global warming and/or climate change........................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3.3 CDA of media discourse on global warming and/or climate change ...... Error! Bookmark not defined. CHAPTER 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .. Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.1 Research questions .............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.2 The study corpora ................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.2.1 The sources ....................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.2.2 Corpus compilation .......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.3 Analytical framework.......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.3.1 Corpus tools used in this study ........................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.3.2 Fairclough‟s Dialectical-Relational analytical framework adopted in this study ................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. CHAPTER 3. POWER RELATION ..................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.1 Newsworthiness of the COPs in The Independent and The New York Times ................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2 The contextual background ................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.3 The unity discourse ............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4 The conflict discourse ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4.1 The conflict between the developed and developing countries ............... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4.2 The conflict among the developed, developing, and small countries ...... Error! Bookmark not defined. CHAPTER 4. THE DEVELOPED COUNTRIES’ RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLIMATE CHANGE ............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.1 The developed countries‟ responsibility for climate change ... Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.2 The developed countries‟ responsibility for climate change is a possibility, not a reality......................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.3 The developed countries‟ attitudes towards their responsibility................. Error! Bookmark not defined. iv CHAPTER 5. THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES’ RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLIMATE CHANGE ............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 5.1 The developing countries‟ responsibility for climate change .. Error! Bookmark not defined. 5.2 The developing countries‟ attitudes towards their responsibility ............... Error! Bookmark not defined. 5.3 The developing countries‟ demands ................... Error! Bookmark not defined. CONCLUSION ........................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 1. Recapitulation ....................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2. Implications ........................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.1 Theoretical implications ...................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.2 Methodological implications ............................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.3 Practical implications .......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.3.1 For the media.................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.3.2 For education ................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3. Limitations ............................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 4. Suggestions for further research............................ Error! Bookmark not defined. REFERENCES ............................................................................................. CLXXVII APPENDIX ..................................................................................................... CLXXII v INTRODUCTION 1. Rationale for the study This research work originated in our interest in the climate change issues and the applicability of critical discourse analysis in exploring the manipulative power exercised through media discourse on climate change. Climate change has been considered one of the most crucial challenges that faces every nation of the world today (see Betsill and Bulkeley, 2004; de Blij, 2005; Dow and Downing, 2007; Hoffman and Woody, 2008; Held, Theros and FaneHervey, 2011; Singer, 2011; Filho and Manolas, 2012; Klein, 2014; Dunlap and Brulle, 2015; to name but a few). It has adversely affected the lives of all people, regardless of their socio-economic status. As a globally comprehensive response to climate change, the annual United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change‟s (UNFCCC) Conferences of the Parties (COPs) – the biggest international climate conferences - have been going on for over twenty years now. Every year, assurances are said and expectations are raised but only partial solutions are produced and little is achieved in terms of concrete tangible outcomes. As the world is becoming ever more polarized between the developed and the developing countries, the rich and the poor countries, even among the rich developed countries themselves and among the developing countries themselves, more and more parties with conflicting interests and benefits are joining the negotiation table at the climate conferences. Particularly, when the issues of responsibility distribution and economic contribution have become more apparent on the agenda of the conferences, such conflicting interests and benefits have contributed to the increased complexity and complication of the contested global debates about climate change issues. Certainly, such a pivotal issue in such a lengthy process involving so many governments and people must definitely resort to particular CLXXII linguistic and discursive means in the media to justify the different parties‟ interests, attitudes and behaviors in ways that they appear fair on the one hand and avoid or delay taking action for their own benefits on the other hand. The situation inspires us to conduct this research to uncover how media language has been manipulated to convey the power relation between the developed and developing countries as well as their responsibilities for climate change. As the climate change debate has become such a globally sophisticated arena, multiple voices are getting heard. Among them, linguists have delved into the analyses of rhetorical devices, discourse strategies, metaphors, framing, and other aspects of text and talk on climate change. Typical examples include Arnal et al. (2014), Boykoff and Boykoff (2004, 2007), Carvalho (2005, 2007), Doulton and Brown (2009), Ereaut and Segnit (2006), Grundmann and Krishnamurthy (2010), Moser and Dilling (2004, 2007), Nerlich and Koteyko (2009, 2011), Painter (2011), Thaker and Leiserowitz (2014), Tillinghast and McCann (2013), Ukonu et al. (2013), Wang (2009), Ward (2008), Wodak and Meyer (2012) who have all commented on the significance of the language used in communicating climate change issues. Despite such a body of literature, however, to our best knowledge, virtually no study has focused on the linguistic realizations of the ideologies about the developed and developing countries‟ responsibilities for climate change which are discursively constructed in the media so as to interpret and explain these countries‟ attitudes, behaviours and actions at the global climate debate. In consideration of the increasingly changing power relations among countries in the world, we believe it is significant to conduct a systematic and critical (discourse) analysis employing linguistic tools with a fairly large sample of media language focusing on the developed and developing countries at the global climate conferences. In so doing, it is expected that the media‟s use of language and the ideologies about these dichotomous countries‟ responsibilities for climate change will be deciphered through the lens of the discursive and social practices that embed the language in the media. CLXXIII 2. Aim and objectives of the study According to the prominent CDA scholars, such as Billig, Chilton, Fairclough, van Dijk, van Leeuwen, and Wodak, one of the most significant purposes of CDA is to decode the ideology embedded in language use. Considering discourse a form of social practice, critical discourse analysts attempt to uncover the reciprocal influences of language and social structure (see Fairclough, 1989, 2015; van Dijk, 1993). Also, CDA aims “to unmask ideologically permeated and often obscured structures of power, political control and dominance as well as strategies of discriminatory inclusion and exclusion in language use” (Wodak, de Cillia, Reisigl and Liebhart, 1999: 8). It could, hence, be deducted that ideology and power relations are of great importance in CDA research. On account of the issues stated in the rationale for this study and in line with the main purpose and aim of CDA, this study was set out to uncover the ideologically contested power relation(s) between the developed and developing countries at the global climate conferences as well as the ideologies about these countries‟ responsibilities for climate change, which are manifested in the English media discourse on climate change under study. In particular, we will analyze how the developed-developing countries‟ power relation and the ideologies about these countries‟ responsibilities for climate change are constructed via the language in The Independent and The New York Times’ newspapers. Therefore, the objectives of the study are: - to analyze the linguistic features in the English media discourse on climate change under study and uncover the power relation(s) between the developed and developing countries at the global climate conferences; and - to analyze the linguistic features in the discourse and decode the ideologies about the developed and developing countries‟ responsibilities for climate change conveyed via the discourse; and - to interpret and explain the power relation(s) between the developed and developing countries and the ideologies about these countries‟ responsibilities CLXXIV for climate change in light of the social, political, and historical context embedding the discourse under study. 3. Research questions In consideration of the aim and objectives stated above, the following research questions were posed: 1. What kind of power relation between the developed and developing countries is constructed in the English media discourse under study? How is this relation linguistically manifested via the discourse? 2. What are the ideologies about the developed and developing countries‟ responsibilities for climate change? How are these ideologies linguistically manifested via the English media discourse under study? 4. Significance of the study From a practical perspective, this research work is expected to contribute to an enhanced understanding of a global concern about the international climate conferences during the period 2004 – 2013 and the newspapers‟ ideologies about the developed and developing countries‟ responsibilities for climate change. More importantly, it is hoped that, as a critical analysis of media discourse, the research will help the newspapers‟ readers see the manipulative power of the media so as to become critical in their reading of the news. From a methodological point of view, this study seeks to not only contribute to an enhanced understanding of how to apply and extend the methodology of CDA, but also to offer insights into the benefits of using corpus techniques to support CDA. From a pedagogical perspective, the findings of the study can be used as a reference for schools and other educational institutions in establishing their educational programs about climate change and critical reading. It is also important CLXXV that the study contribute to raising faculty and students‟ awareness of the role of CDA in education and the role of media language in constituting the society. 5. Contextual background As analyses of mediated discourse often entail the examination of discursive practices as well as the broader societal conditions that “frame discourse practices and texts” (Fairclough, 1998: 144), this section provides the social and discursive contexts embedding the study discourse so as to lay the background for the study. Social context Climate change officially emerged on the world‟s agenda at the Earth Summit in 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, which agreed on the importance of the problem and created a framework, the UNFCCC, for international action, although it left actual policy recommendations mostly for the future. Being the most prominent spokesperson on the state of climate change(1), the UNFCCC aims at preventing humans‟ dangerous interventions into climate. In 1995, there were international talks in order to urge the whole world to respond to climate change. In 1997, the UNFCCC met in Kyoto (Japan) and approved of the Kyoto Protocol. But it was not until 2005 that the protocol came into effect. Under this protocol, industrialized countries are encouraged to reduce their greenhouse gases emissions to 5% below 1990 levels to keep the global temperature within 2°C above pre-industrial levels. Although the Kyoto protocol has been widely criticized as a weak and indecisive agreement, it is the strongest international legal framework that the world‟s countries have so far been able to agree upon. For the time being, however, there are quite different attitudes towards the protocol. On the one hand, the rich industrialized countries in the European Union, including Britain, were pioneers and have achieved certain success in reducing greenhouse gases emissions. On the other hand, such countries as the United States, Canada and Australia have been really 1 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, http://www.ipcc.ch/ CLXXVI reluctant to commit to the targets in the Kyoto protocol for fear that these targets REFERENCES Arnall, A., Kothari, U., & Kelman, I. (2014). Introduction to politics of climate change: discourses of policy and practice in developing countries. The Geographical Journal, 180(2), 98-101. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12054 Askehave, I. (2007). The impact of marketisation on higher education genres – the international student prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies, 9, 723-742. doi: 10.1177/1461445607082576 Asplund, T. (2011). Metaphors in climate discourse: an analysis of Swedish farm magazines. Journal of Science Communication, 10(4), 1-8. Baker, P. (2004). Querying Keywords: Questions of Difference, and Sense in Keyword Analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 32(4), 346-359. Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum. Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., Wodak, R. (2008). A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourse of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273-306. BASIC experts. (2011). Equitable access to sustainable development: Contribution to the body of scientific knowledge. BASIC expert group: Beijing, Brasilia, Cape Town and Mumbai, Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/bonn_apr_2013/application/pdf/academic_paper_ on_the_brazilian_proposal_20130503.pdf on 1st September, 2015. Betsill, M. & Bulkeley, H. (2004). Cities and Climate Change. Taylor & Francis. Beyerlin, U. (2006). Bridging the North-South Divide in International Environmental Law. Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 66, 259-296. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage. Billig, M. & Schegloff, E. (1999). Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis: An exchange between Michael Billig and Emanuel A. Schegloff. Discourse & Society, 10(4), 543-582. CLXXVII Bishop, H. & Jaworski, A. (2003). “We beat „em‟: Nationalism and the hegemony of homogeneity in the British press reportage of Germany versus English during Euro 2000, Discourse & Society, 14 (3), 243-271. Boykoff, M.T, & Boykoff, J.M. (2004). Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136. doi: .1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001 Boykoff, M. (2008). The cultural politics of climate change discourse in UK tabloids. Political Geography, 27, 549-569. Boykoff, M. T. & Roberts, J. T. (2007). Media coverage of climate change: current trends, strenghts, weaknesses: United Nations Development Programme. Breeze, R. (2013). Corporate Discourse. Bloomsbury Publishing. Caillaud, S., Kalampalikis, N., & Flick, U. (2012). The Social Representations of the Bali Climate Conference in the French and German Media. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 363-378. doi: 10.1002/casp.1117 Cannon, T. & Mueller-Mahn, D. (2010). Vulnerability, resilience and development discourses in context of climate change. Natural Hazards. doi: DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4 Carvalho, A., (2005). Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect: discursive strategies in the British media. Critical Discourse Studies, 2, 1-29. Carvalho, A., & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in the UK broadsheet newspapers 1985-2003. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1457-1470. Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 223-243. Carvalho, A. & Pereira, E. (2008). Communicating climate change in Portugal: A critical analysis of journalism and beyond. In A. Carvalho (Ed.), Communicating Climate Change: Discourses, Mediations and Perceptions. Universidade do Minho: Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade. Castilla, E.B., Quesada, M., & Teruel Rodríguez, L. (2013). From Kyoto to Durban. Mass Media Editorial Position about Climate Change. Revista Latina de Communicación Social, 68, 420-435. doi: 10.4815/RLCS-2013-983en Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Politics and Rhetoric. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CLXXVIII Chen, S. (2013). Corpus Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis: A Case Study on News Reports of the 2011 Libyan Civil War. Stream: Culture/Politics/Technology, 5(1), 21-28. Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. Chiras, D.D. (2014). Environmental Science. Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chouliaraki, L. (1999). Media discourse and national identity: Death and myth in a news broadcast. In R. Wodak & C. Ludwig (Eds.), Challenges in a Changing World: Issues in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 37-62). Wien: Passagen Verlag. Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Chritical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Coffey, B. (2010). The Politics of ‘Sustainability’: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Victorian Government Policy Discourse, 1999-2006. (PhD), The University of Queensland. Dahl, T. & Fløttum, K. (2014). A linguistic framework for studying voices and positions in the climate debate. Text & Talk, 34(4), 401-420. Das, R. C. (1998). The Environmental Divide: The Dilemma of Developing Countries. New Delhi: APH Publishing Corporation. de Blij, H. (2005). Why Geography Matters: Three Challenges Facing America: Climate Change, the Rise of China, and Global Terrorism. Oxford University Press. Dispensa, J. M, & Brulle, R. J. (2003). Media‟s social construction of environmental issues: Focus on global warming – a comparative study. Science Communication, 35(3), 334-357. doi: 10.1177/1075547012457470 Dongmei, W. (2013). Applying Corpus Linguistics in Discourse Analysis. Studies in Literature and Language 6(2), 35-39. doi: 10.3968/j.sll.1923156320130602.4002 Doulton, H. & Brown, K. (2009). Ten years to prevent catastrophe? Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press. Global Environmental Change, 19, 191-202. Dow, K. & Downing, T. E. (2007). The atlas of climate change: mapping the world's greatest challenge. University of California Press. Dryzek, J. S. (2005). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CLXXIX Dunlap, R. E. & Brulle, R. J. (2015). Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives. Oxford University Press. Ellermann, C., Höhne, N., & Müller, B. (2011). Differentiating historical responsibilities for climate change. In P. G. Harris (Ed.), China's responsibility for climate change: Ethics, fairness and environmental policy: Policy Press. Ereaut, G. & Segnit, N. (2006). Warm Words: How are we telling the climate story and can we tell it better? London: Institute for Public Policy Research. Eskjaer, M. F. (2009). Communicating Climate Change in Regional News Media. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 1(4), 356– 367. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power (2nd ed.). London: Longman. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press. Fairclough, N. (1995a). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman. Fairclough, N. (1995b). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London; New York: Longman. Fairclough, N. (1995c). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold. Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction - Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 258-284). London: Sage. Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge. Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power (2nd ed.). London: Longman. Fairclough, N. (2005). Critical discourse analysis, organizational discourse, and organizational change. Organization Studies, 26, 915-39. Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and Power (3rd ed.). London: Longman. Filho, W. L. & Manolas, E. (2012). English through Climate Change. Democritus University of Thrace: Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources. Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications. Fowler, R. (1985). Power. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Vol. 4, pp. 61-82). London: Academic Press, Inc. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge. CLXXX Fowler, R. (1996). On critical linguistics. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 3–14). London: Routledge. Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and Control. London: Routledge. Gallagher, S. (1998). An Intercultural Reading and Critical Analysis of the Discipline of Educational Psychology. PhD thesis. University of Loyola Chicago. Goddard, P., Robinson, P., & Parry, K. (2008) “Patriotism Meets Plurality: Reporting the 2003 Iraq War in the British Press.” Media, War and Conflict, 1 (1), 9–30. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. NowellSmith, Trans.). Grundmann, R. & Krishnamurthy, R. (2010). The Discourse of Climate Change: A Corpus-based Approach. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 4(2), 113-133. Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1 ed.). London: Arnold. Hansen, A. (1991). The media and the social construction of the environment. Media, Culture, and Society, 13(4), 443-458. Held, D., Theros, M., & Fane-Hervey, A. (2011). The Governance of Climate Change. Polity Press. Hernández, A. M. (2014). Strategic Facilitation of Complex Decision-Making: How Process and Context Matter in Global Climate Change Negotiations. Springer. Hoffman, A. J. & Woody, J. G. (2008). Climate Change: What's Your Business Strategy? Harvard Business Press. Hulme, M. (2007). Newspaper scare headlines can be counter-productive. Nature, 445, 818. Huq, S. & Sokona, Y. (2001). Climate Change Negotiations: A View from the South. Opinion: World Summit on Sustainable Development. London: International Institute for Environment and Development. Jäger, S. & Maier, F. (2012). Theoretical and methodological aspects of Foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Anlysis. London: Sage. CLXXXI Janks, H. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis as a Research Tool. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(3), 329-342. Jeffries, L. & Walker, B. (2012). Key words in the press - A critical corpus-driven analysis of ideology in the Blair years (1998- 2007). English Text Construction, 5(2), 208-229. Johnson, S. & Esslin, A. (2006). Language in the news: Some reflections on keyword analysis using Wordsmith Tools and the BNC. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics, 11. Kandil, M. A. (2009). The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict in American, Arab, and British Media: Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis. (PhD), Georgia State University. Retrieved June 2013 from http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=alesl_diss Kean-Wah, L. & Ming, T. S. (2010). A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Malaysian Smart Schools (mss) Conceptual Blueprint and Implications to Implementation. The International Journal Of Language Society And Culture, 30(20), 142-154. Klein, N. (2014). This Changes Everything: Capitalism Vs. The Climate. USA: Simon and Schuster. Koch, H.J., König, D., Sanden, J., & Verheyen, R. (2012). Climate Change and Environmental Hazards Related to Shipping: An International Legal Framework: Proceedings of the Hamburg International Environmental Law Conference 2011. M. Nijhoff Publishers. Koller, V. (2012). How to Analyze Collective Identity in Discourse – Textual and Contextual Parameters. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 5(2), 19-38. Koteyko, N., Jaspal, R., & Nerlich, B. (2013). Climate change and „climategate‟ in online reader comments: a mixed methods study. The Geographical Journal, 179(1), 74–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2012.00479.x Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Lillian, D. L. (2008). Modality, Persuasion and Manipulation in Canadian Conservative Discourse. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 2(1), 1-16. CLXXXII Linder, S. H. (2006). Cashing-in on risk claims: on the for-profit inversion of signifiers for “global warming”. Social Semiotics, 16(1), 103-132. Livesey, S. M. (2002). Global Warming Wars: Rhetorical and Discourse Analytic Approaches to ExxonMobil‟s Corporate Public Discourse. Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 117-148. Luke, A. (2002). Beyond Science and Ideology Critique: Developments in Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 96-110. Macko, D. (2012). The Use of Software for the Analysis of Lexical Properties of Legal Discourse. Studies about Languages, 20. Mautner, G. (2012). Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics can Contribute to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage. McComas, K. & Shanahan, J. (1999). Telling Stories About Global Climate Change: Measuring the Impact of Narratives on Issue Cycles. Communication Research, 26(1), 30-57. doi: 10.1177/009365099026001003 Mejia, D. A. (2010). The Evolution of the Climate Change Regime: Beyond a North-South Divide? Barcelona, Spain: Institut Cata la Internacional per la Pau. Merkl-Davies, D.M. & Koller, V. (2012). Metaphoring‟ people out of this world: A Critical Discourse Analysis of a chairman‟s statement of a UK defense firm. Accounting Forum, 36(3), 178-193. Moser, S.C. & Dilling, B. L. (2004). Making climate hot: communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environment, 46(10), 32-46. Moser, S. C. & Dilling, B. L. (2007). Creating a Climate for Change Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge University Press. Mulderrig, J. (2011). Manufacturing Consent: a corpus-based critical discourse analysis of New Labour‟s educational governance. Journal of Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6). Najam, A. (2005). Why Environmental Politics Looks Different from the South. In P. Dauvergne (Ed.), Handbook of Environmental Politics (pp. 111-126). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Nerlich, B. & Koteyko, N. (2009). Compounds, creativity and complexity in climate change communication: The case of „carbon indulgences‟. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 345–353. CLXXXIII Nerlich, B., Evans, V. & Koteyko, N. (2011). Low carbon diet': reducing the complexities of climate change to human scale. Language and cognition, 3(1), 45-82. Olausson, U. (2009). "Global Warming - Global Responsibility" Media Frames of Collective Action and Scientific Certainty. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 421-436. Painter, J. (2011). Poles Apart: The international reporting of climate change scepticism. Oxford: RSIJ: Oxford University. Parks, B. & Roberts, J.T. (2010). Climate change, social theory and justice. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2-3), 134-166. Penetrante, A. M. (2010). Politics of Equity and Justice in Climate Change Negotiations in North-South Relations. In H. G. Brauch, U. Spring, C. Mesjasz, J. Grin, P. Kameri-Mbote, B. Chourou, P. Dunay & J. Birkmann (Eds.), Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security - Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks (Vol. 5). Berlin, Heigelberg & New York: Hexagon Springer-Verlag. Penetrante, A. M. (2011). The Entanglement of Climate Change in North-South Relations: Stumbling Blocks and Opportunities for Negotiation. In K. Richardson, S. Will & D. Livermann (Eds.), Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges and Decisions (pp. 356-359). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Penetrante, A. M. (2013). Common but Differentiated Responsibilities. The NorthSouth Divide in the Climate Change Negotiations. In G. Sjostedt & A. M. Penetrante (Eds.), Climate Change Negotiations. A Guide to Resolving Disputes and Facilitating Multilateral Cooperation (pp. 249-276). London: Routledge. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R (2012). The discourse historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 87-121). London: Sage. Reynolds, D.W. (1995). Repetition in Non-native Speaker Writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 185–209. Richardon, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: an approach from critical discourse analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Richards, M. (2001). A Review of the Effectiveness of Developing Country Participation in the Climate Change Convention Negotiations. Retrieved 25 CLXXXIV
- Xem thêm -

Tài liệu liên quan