Đăng ký Đăng nhập
Trang chủ Ngoại ngữ TOEFL - IELTS - TOEIC Hướng dẫn chung về bài luận tiếng anh...

Tài liệu Hướng dẫn chung về bài luận tiếng anh

.PDF
12
299
84

Mô tả:

For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at www.tailieuduhoc.org Hướng dẫn chung về bài luận: 1. Topics: Some intensive English programs in the United States offer a foreign student the option of living with an American family while he or she is studying abroad. Many students feel that such a home-stay program is a valuable part of their total learning experience. However, others may feel that such a plan offers little value. In a short essay, discuss one or two advantages of living with an American family and then state one or two disadvantages. Tell whether you are in favor of or opposed to the idea of home-stay. Give examples to support your opinion. 2) Outline Advantages: · Opportunity to learn about American customs ----How to behave on different occasions ----Other aspects of American life · Environment to improve English ----Conversation with family members ----Homework Disadvantages: · Lack of privacy and independence ----Family activities · Being treated like a child ----Making friends ----Leisure activities 3) Opening: There is much disagreement over whether it is necessary for a foreign student who is studying in the United States to live with an American family. Some people maintain that the home-stay program is meaningless. Other people, however, argue that such a program is a valuable part of their total learning experience. If I were forced to agree with one of the two positions, my choice would be for the latter. 4) Body: Why do some people dislike the idea of staying with an American family? For one thing, these people think that living with an American family involves both a lack of privacy and little opportunity to be independent. For instance, the foreign student may find that the family expects him or her to join them in group activities such as watching television and going on picnics. At times, however, he or she might enjoy staying alone to read or to write letters. For another, living in an American home involves the possibility that the family may treat the student like a child. For example, the parents For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at www.tailieuduhoc.org may want to decide who the student's friends will be and how he or she should spend the leisure time. Although I agree that there may be one or two disadvantages to living with an American family, I insist that the advantages far outweigh them. In the first place, by taking part in a home-stay program, the student gains an excellent opportunity to learn about American customs. He or she will find out how to behave in different social situations such as parties and ceremonies and how to dress on these occasions. In addition, the student will learn about many other aspects of the American way of life, such as the way schools are run in the United States. With a family close by, he or she can ask questions about attendance rules and school costs. Meanwhile, the family will make certain that the student becomes acquainted with this new way of life, and soon he or she will feel at home. In the second place, living with an American family provides the student with an ideal environment to improve his or her English. For example, each time the student has a conversation with someone in the family, this native speaker can help with his or her pronunciation and grammar. Maybe even the young children in the family can help the student with his or her homework. As a result, English will surround the student most of the time during his or her stay in the United States. 5) Conclusion: In conclusion, I believe that the advantages of a home-stay program are more obvious than its disadvantages not only because the student can learn about American customs in the most natural way possible, but also because the student can improve his or her English more effectively in the native language environment. 6) · Brief Checklist ----Have I answered the question? ----Does my essay have an introduction, a body, and a conclusion? ----Does my introduction have a thesis statement? ----Does each body paragraph have a topic sentence? ----Does each topic sentence have sufficient examples and/or reasons? ----Have I correctly used transitions and reference words? ----Does each paragraph have sentence variety? ----Does my conclusion make it clear which side I support? ----Are there any run-on sentences or fragments? ----Have I used parallel structure correctly? ----Have I indented each paragraph? ----Have I used capital letters correctly? ----Have I made any mistakes in punctuation? ----Are there any spelling mistakes? ----Have I made other obvious grammatical mistakes? For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at www.tailieuduhoc.org Hướng dẫn về cách liên kết câu: Topic 1: In most elementary and high schools in the United States, the average class size is 25 to 30 students. In some countries, schools have an average class size of more than 60 students. In your opinion, what would be the ideal class size? Explain why. Which kind of class size is better? In the United States, a typical class in most elementary and high schools has 25 to 30 students, while in some other countries the average class size can amount to more than 60 students. As far as I am concerned, a class of about 20 students is ideal. In the first place, the teacher can satisfy the demands of all the students in a small class. As there are only about 20 students in the class, it will not be long before the teacher comes to know his or her students well enough. The teacher can get to know the abilities and problems of each student, which makes it easy for the teacher to handle the class. Consequently, every question can be answered; every request can be satisfied, and every bit of talent can be tapped. In the second place, teaching in a small class can be more effective than in a bigger one. The main reason, I suppose, is that there are more opportunities of communication between the teacher and the students in a small class. For example, the teacher can ask more questions and the students have more chances to answer questions. If necessary, a class can be conducted in the manner of discussion, in which all the participants, including the teacher, can actively exchange views over an idea or issue. In addition, not only does the teacher in a small class find it easier to organize the class, but also the students can hear more clearly and thus be more attentive in class. All this is almost impossible in a class of about 60 students. A case in point is the class size of the elementary and high schools in China. Because each class has more than 50 students, those who sit at the back of the classroom cannot hear the teacher clearly and hence often become absent-minded in class. The teaching result is often unsatisfactory. In conclusion, I believe that a small class of about 20 students is more advantageous not only because in such a class the teacher can better satisfy the needs of students, but also because it makes the teaching and studying more effective. Therefore, I strongly advocate that all schools should adopt the policy of small class size. Topic 2: Developments in transportation such as the invention of the automobile have had an enormous impact on modern society. Choose another development in transportation that you think is of great importance. Give reasons for your selection. For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at www.tailieuduhoc.org Human transportation has witnessed quite a few revolutionary changes. As far as I am concerned, one of the most important developments in transportation has been the invention of international jet transport. Since this style of transportation appeared in the 1950s, it has caused widespread revolutionary effects and has actually changed the way people look at the world. In the first place, jet travel surpasses all other means of land transport in speed. A hundred years ago, it took weeks to cross the Atlantic or Pacific Oceans by ship. Today, those same trips can be completed in a matter of hours. One can attend a meeting in Paris and have dinner in New York the same day. In fact, the amazing speed of the jet plane has changed people's concept of space. Today the world is much smaller than it was in the past. In the second place, jet travel is less expensive but more comfortable. One hundred years ago, since an international journey was extremely expensive, only wealthy people could afford to travel comfortably, while poor people had to save for years in order to purchase a ticket. Besides, the traveling conditions then were almost unbearable. Today, however, due to the invention of jet planes, it is possible for more and more people in every country to travel in comfort. Businessmen fly from city to city to make fortunes; students fly home from abroad to visit their parents; and tourists fly from country to country to enjoy their sightseeing. In conclusion, I argue that the international jet travel has changed the world not only because it can take us from place to place at a surprisingly high speed, but also because it makes it possible for more and more people to travel at a relatively low cost. Today, individual nations are not as isolated as they were in the past, and people now think of the whole planet as they once thought of their own hometowns. Therefore, I strongly hold that the development of the jet travel is of great importance in the history of transportation. Topic 3: Some people say that exploration of outer space has many advantages; other people feel that it is a waste of money and other resources. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. With the development of outer space exploration, many people begin to doubt whether the endeavor is worthwhile. It is true that some money and other resources must be spent in this area, but in my opinion, human beings should continue the adventure because it can add to our knowledge, acquire new resources, and even find places where human beings can live. To begin with, the exploration of outer space will add to our knowledge about the universe as well as about the earth. Although human beings have been living on the earth for thousands of years, we know very little about it. For example, we are not even sure about how the earth came into being, why the dinosaurs disappeared altogether from the face of the earth, and whether there is life on other planets. The attempt to explore outer space will certainly help us answer all these questions and bring us a great many benefits. In addition, the exploration of outer space may help mitigate the energy crisis. As we all know, our oil, coal, and other conventional fuels will be exhausted in the near future. For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at www.tailieuduhoc.org Although the scientists are looking for alternatives on the earth, such as nuclear power, we may launch spacecraft to the moon or other planets, where natural resources might be abundant and untapped. Last but not least, the exploration of outer space may find new habitation for human beings. Our earth is becoming more and more uninhabitable because of the population explosion. Although we have tried various means to relieve the burden of overpopulation, such as the building of skyscrapers and the practice of birth control, but the problem is getting increasingly serious. The best way, I think, is to turn our eyes to outer space. Some scientists are already working on the possible human migration to another planet, say, the Mars. Since space exploration has so many important advantages, there is no reason for any objection to it. Those who only see the financial and material resources used for this undertaking are near-sighted. Would they leave the earth in a state of overcrowding, energy shortage, and severe pollution? Would they remain ignorant of the earth upon which human beings depend for survival? If not, they should change their position and support the scheme for space exploration Topic 4: Some students like to have outdoor activities. Others like indoor activities. Which do you prefer? Give specific reasons and examples to illustrate your answer. Students differ in the activities they enjoy. Some may be fond of outdoor activities, while others would like to spend almost all of their time indoors. Although I cannot persuade those who prefer outdoor activities to give up their hobbies, I, personally, can always find pleasure and satisfaction in the various indoor activities that interest me. To begin with, indoor activities are more convenient and can be done at any time and in any place. Whether it is night or day, rainy or sunny, warm or cold, we can stay at home playing chess, reading books, listening to music, operating computers or even just thinking. Furthermore, we are free from the limit of space. For example, in order to do some reading, we do not need a court, which is necessary for playing tennis. And we will never be upset because we cannot afford a racket. Another but more important advantage of indoor activities, I think, is that they can greatly help open one's mind and make one intelligent. By reading, we can become more knowledgeable; by meditating, we can become wiser; by surfing on the Internet, we can wander in the wonderland of information and knowledge. In short, I believe that indoor activities are more important and more beneficial. On the one hand, these activities do not require special conditions. On the other hand, we can benefit more from them. Topic 1: Some people prefer work or activities that mainly involve working with people. Others choose work or activities that mainly deal with objects or machines. Compare these types of activities. Which of them do you prefer? Give reasons to support you answer. For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at www.tailieuduhoc.org There is much disagreement over whether it is better to work with people or with objects or machines. Some people claim that it is more comfortable to work with objects or machines. Others, however, argue that working with people is more pleasant. If I were forced to agree with one of the two positions, my choice would be the latter. Why do some people think that working with objects or machines are more advantageous than working with people? For one thing, objects or machines are easier to deal with. Since both objects and machines have no wills, they do not argue with us. On the contrary, they are always ready to follow our directions. For another, objects or machines are reliable. Unlike people who sometimes hurt our feelings, they never cheat us. In addition, I suppose, these people cannot adapt themselves to the human world of competition. Although I agree that working with objects or machines certainly has its advantages, I insist that it is far more beneficial and exciting to work with people. In the first place, when I work with people, I can work more efficiently than when I work with machines or objects. The reason, in my opinion, is that working with people gives us power and competition and thus make our work more productive. In this sense, rivalry can become a very effective motive in improving one's ability. Moreover, two heads are always better than one. In the second place, working with people is more interesting than working with machines or objects. The latter makes one bored, and it takes much more time to complete a certain task. Besides, if one spends most of his or her time only handling machines or objects, he or she can become indifferent and inhuman. Though machines may be very accurate, they have no hearts. In other words, it is hard to feel love for machines or objects. In conclusion, I believe that working with people is far more valuable not only because it increases our efficiency in work, but also because it brings us a sense of companionship that contributes to the meaning of our life as well as our work. Therefore, I prefer working with people. Topic 2: Violent TV programs have been blamed for causing crime rates to rise in many cities. But many people do not agree that violence is related to TV viewing. Discuss the possible reasons for both opinions. Give your opinion as to whether or not violent programs should be taken off the air. There is much debate over whether violent TV programs are relevant to the rise of crime rates or not. Some people assert that it is obvious that violent TV programs cause violence. Others, however, do not agree that violence is related to TV viewing at all. As far as I am concerned, the disgraceful violent TV programs should be largely responsible for the rising rates of crime in modern cities. Why do some people disagree that the violence on TV programs should be blamed for the rise of crime rates? For one thing, they presuppose that everyone has self-control. Except by force, one cannot make a person do anything which he or she is not willing to. Since TV programs are something over the air broadcast simply for fun, how can they control a person without recourse to any physical means? For another, those people believe that everything can be changed except the essential character of an individual. In most cases, just as a law-abiding citizen always abides by the law, criminals cannot For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at www.tailieuduhoc.org change their own character no matter how much punishment they have suffered in jail. It is their character rather than TV violence that drives them to commit crimes. Violent TV programs, they conclude, are innocent Although I agree that the individual's self-control and character has certain effect on his or her behavior, I insist that the external environment plays a far more important role in forming people's moral values and behavior, to say nothing of children and the youth who have not yet fully developed their own "self-control and character." In the first place, violent TV programs tend to obscure the difference between good and evil, harming the social morals and values. As we know, Evil is the next-door neighbor of Good; even an adult sometimes cannot distinguish them, needless to say a teenager. Consider the case of a boy who imitates the violence on TV just out of curiosity without knowing that he is doing something that he would regret in his rest life. Can you still claim that it is the fault of the boy, not the violent programs, because he is a born criminal?! In the second place, violent TV programs can gradually change people's behavior, misleading them to the belief that violence is the most effective way to resolve conflicts. Nowadays, as soon as you turn on your TV, violence is vividly presented before you, with the success of the criminals encouraging you, the luxurious booty tempting you, and the stupidity of the police cheering you. The implied message is obvious: if you want to get rich fast, STEAL, ROB AND MURDER! How many people can resist this tempting invitation? From what has been discussed above, we may draw the conclusion that violent TV programs have in a large sense caused crime rates to rise not only because of their destructive influence on people's morality, but also because of their vicious effect on people's behavior. Therefore, I strongly hold that they should be censored strictly. Topic 3: Some people like different friends. Others like similar friends. Compare the advantages of these two kinds of friends. Which kind of friends do you prefer? Explain why. Which kind of friends is more desirable, different friends or similar friends? Since people's criterion for friendship differs, they may never agree on the above issue. Personally, I have made friends with people from all walks of life, and these different friendships are such a precious treasure of mine. In the first place, a mixture of friends can bring us many practical benefits. As the saying goes, a friend in need is a friend indeed. Since we all need to move on in life, we need new friends to lead us to new adventures, new career opportunities and new life. In fact, most of us have to make new friends when we leave school and find employment. Besides, different friends can help us with the different difficulties that we encounter in life. At the risk of sounding cold, different friends can also help us with financial problems. And the friend in a foreign country might be able to arrange cheap accommodation for a holiday. In the second place, contact with different friends gives a person a broad outlook to life. As the Chinese sage Confucious put it, "When three persons walk together, one of them can surely be my teacher." Since we all have our weaknesses, the strengths of different friends can always complement each other. For example, from a friend who For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at www.tailieuduhoc.org majors in computer, I have learned how to design my own web page; by exchanging emails with an American pen-friend, I have greatly improved my English writing. In addition, different friends can help me to enjoy a variety of interests, and we can always attract each other with our different hobbies, different ideas and different experiences. I feel that I can always find things to learn from my various friend friends. Admittedly, common sense tells us that the idea of having similar friends is not without advantages. We can feel a sense of strength when we have a group of friends who share our opinions. A person with a purpose in life--such as an artist or a politician-may feel a special need to surround himself or herself with people who stick to the same cause. It seems to me that introvert people tend to enjoy similar friends because they fear the potential risks of arguments and conflicts among different friends. All in all, although "birds of a feather flock together," I would like to fly with "birds" of different feathers, which would certainly add to the color of my life. Topic 4: There are advantages and disadvantages to different seasons of the year such as rainy or dry. Pick any two seasons that you are familiar with and compare the two. Describe what it is that makes you prefer one over the other. What activities do you engage in? What feelings do you have during this season? Year in and year out, the four seasons, like our faithful friends, bring to us expected joys and satisfactions. The year would be much less colorful with any one of the four seasons missing. However, on balance, I like summer and winter best of all because they provide me with diversity that I look for in my life. In the hot summer season, the world is full of life. Flowers are blooming, birds are singing, and I feel energetic about different kinds of outdoor activities, such as jogging, bicycling, and swimming. Actually, swimming is one of my favorite sports. In water, both body and mind have to work together either to move forward or simply float. It is good stress reduction for the intensive modern life that many of us have. Summer also enables us to have more fresh fruits and vegetables. I like to go to the farmers' market where I can enjoy the good prices, the availability of fresh produce, and the farmers' smiles. In winter, on the other hand, the world is quiet and peaceful. Inside the house, there is nice warmth, with friends or relatives chatting over cups of hot tea or coffee. Or if you like, you can sit in front of your window enjoying the pleasure of quiet reading. Outside in the open air, the world is beautiful with roads, trees, mountains, lakes, everything, dressed in pure white snow. It's fun to watch children play in the snow or to join them in making a snowman. It would be even more exciting, if you live in the countryside, to follow the trails of foxes or hares on the snowfield. In a word, summer is colorful while winter is tranquil. On the one hand, the exciting activities of summer can always fill me with joy; on the other hand, the poetic scenes of winter arouse tender feelings in my heart. However, I prefer winter for the simple reason that I was born in a snowy winter 20 years ago and that every winter there is a splendid birthday party waiting for me. For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at www.tailieuduhoc.org So sánh 2 bài viết chưa được sửa và đã được sửa: Topic:Some people think that parents should plan their children's leisure time carefully. Others believe that children should decide for themselves how to spend their free time. Student Essay: It goes without saying that one's childhood is the most wonderful and unforgettable time in one's life. As far as I'm concerned, I quite agree to it. First of all, take me for a good example, my parents are like good teachers and helpful friends in my life. As I remember, they never interfered with my life excessively. They always left enough freedom to me so that I could embark upon what I liked to do in my spare time. Because they quite understood that my weekdays were occupied with a heavey workload, only in my spare time could I have a change of pace. Mutual understanding is very important in my family. I no way, however, does it mean they live me overmuch. They were austere teachers, when I made mistakes. They were good friends, when I came upon something dificult. Now that I grow up to possess characteristics of self-confidence, optimism, and independence which enable me to face the challenges and failures in my life with joy, I am very grateful for my parents. Without them, I would be far from happiness. On the contrarry, some parents expect too much of their children. This can give rise to such a situation. Parents would rather pay more attention to their children's study than their interests and hapiness, thus resulting in serious misunderstanding between parents and children. Some parents even "help" their children make a schedule in order to make the best use of time. Children are deprived of hapiness in that they have to do so many homework both form within the school and without, under their parents' watchful eyes. Therefore, children are more likely to be introverts heavily dependent on their parents when they grow up. this will definitely bring forth come disadvantages. For one thing, they will find it's much difficult to adjust themselves to the competitive society. Besides, it's not easy for them to get used to expose themselves to other people. As we know, confining oneself in an ivory tower will make it hard for him to communicate with others. The interaction between people, however, plays a major role in one's career, is one of the most important elements in achieving success. Revised Essay: Childhood is a decisive period in the process of one's growth. Therefore, many people think that parents should carefully plan not only their children's school education but also their spare time. Other people, however, argue that children should have the freedom to plan their own extracurricular life. On balance, I would side with those parents who respect children's freedom and independence. If children have the freedom to make decisions on how to spend their spare time and develop their interests, they will gradually form a sense of responsibility and become more capable in the life world. Take myself as a good example. My parents are like good teachers and helpful friends in my life. As I remember, they never excessively interfered with my life and always left enough freedom to me so that I could embark upon what I liked to do in my spare time. They quite understood that my weekdays were occupied For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at www.tailieuduhoc.org with a heavy workload, and that only in my spare time I could have a change of pace. Meanwhile, although mutual understanding and tolerance were an important part of my childhood life, in no way does it mean that they spoiled me. They were austere teachers when I made mistakes, and helpful friends when I came across difficulties. Owing to their understanding, tolerance, guidance, and above all, love, I have grown up to be a person of self-confidence, optimism, and independence, ready to confront any challenges in my life. Without the free family environment that my parents carefully designed for me, I wouldn't have lived such a happy life. On the contrary, some parents expect too much of their children, depriving them of all their independence and freedom. These parents would rather sacrifice their children's interests and happiness for nothing but good scores, thus resulting in serious misunderstanding between parents and children. Some parents even went so far as to plan their children's schedule, filling every minute with study task. In this case, children are deprived of happiness because they are bound hand and foot by endless homework, numerous exams and boring evening or weekend classes. Furthermore, having no freedom to plan their own life, these children are more likely to become introvert, heavily dependent on their parents when they grow up. This will definitely affect their growth. For one thing, since they have no opportunity to develop their independent thinking and explore their potential, they will find it very difficult to adjust themselves to the competitive society. For another, confining oneself in an ivory tower will make it hard for him or her to communicate with others. This will affect their career development in the future because the interaction between people plays a major role in the workplace, and is one of the most important elements in achieving career success. Obviously, parents' excessive interference with children's after-school life, if carried to the extreme, can cause serious damage to both their happy childhood and their career in the future. To sum up, I believe that parents should leave enough freedom and privacy to their children with a view to cultivating their character. As long as parents allow their children the necessary freedom accompanied by careful guidance, their children will grow up to be independent, responsible and successful. Case 2 Topic: Some students participate in school activities such as clubs and sports. Other students do not take part in such activities because they spend more time on their studies. Tell why you think the two groups of students spend their time differently? Which type of students do you prefer to be? Explain why. Student Essay: Most people think the duty of students is study so it is natural for them to spend more time on their study. On the contrary, some people think out-course activities are also important. Why students are always forced to study diligently? One reason is that for long time scores are the only criteria to judge students' behavior in the school. If a student is studying hard, he or she will be praised as a "good student", if not, he or she will be regarded as "something wrong". The other reason is simple. The goal of studying in school is to get better grades and then go to better high-level school and at the end, get a For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at www.tailieuduhoc.org better and stable job. Surely one of the most important aim of students is to acquire as much knowledge as they can in order to qualify their future work. But much more disadvantages can it brings to the student's future adult life, if he or she only put their eyes on books. Spend too much time on their study. Students will have no time to attend in other activities such as, clubs and sports, which could open a New World for them. By attending these activities, we find that students can exchange and share views with others. They can be taught to be more open, more competitive, and more independent. Some activities can exercise students' management and organizational skills. They are useful for their future challenges. And with development of these skills and experiences, students can be more concentrates on their study and sometimes, it can help them to get better result in studying than they expected. The very example is this year's number one student who pass the exams of high school education. While in middle school, he is very active in sports and club activities. Moreover, he is the leader of his class. When talking on his success, he says the school activities give him opportunities to enrich his abilities and skills. It helps them to encounter the exams with not much stress and burden. Therefore, I totally in favor of the idea that students should be encouraged to participate in more free course activities, not only because it can help them to develop more skills and abilities, but also because it can help their studies, vice verse. Revised Essay: Most people think that the duty of students is to study, so it is natural for them to spend more time on their study. On the contrary, some people argue that extracurricular activities are also important. As far as I concerned, I prefer attending various school activities to sitting all the time before the table. Why do some students spend all their time studying so diligently? One reason is that for a long time scores have been regarded as the only criterion to judge students' performance at school. If a student studies hard, he or she will be praised as a "good student". If not, he or she will be labeled as a "bad student". Another reason is that many people assumes that the goal of studying at school is to get high scores, then go to famous universities or graduate schools, and in the end, get a high-salary job. Surely one of the most important aims of students is to acquire as much knowledge as they can in order to qualify themselves for their future career. But if they limit themselves to book knowledge, they will miss the opportunities to develop in an all-round way, which will certainly bring about a lot of disadvantages to their future adult life. Actually, attending other activities such as clubs and sports does more good than harm to students. By participating in these activities, students can exchange and share views with one another and learn to become more open-minded, more competitive, and more independent. What's more, some activities can train students' management skills, which are useful for the challenges in their future career. With the development of these skills and the accumulation of communicative experience, students will be able to deal with their courses more effectively and thus attain better achievements in their study than they expected. As the saying goes, "all work and no play, makes Jack a dull boy." A striking example is Li Yang, this year's Number One in the National Higher Education Entrance Examination in China. At middle school, he was very active in sports and club For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at www.tailieuduhoc.org activities. Besides, as monitor of his class, he spent a lot of time organizing debates, parties, and various contests. Talking about his success, he said that the school activities gave him opportunities to develop his abilities and skills, which not only contributed to his study in class, but more importantly, prepared him for the challenges in his coming college life. Therefore, I am totally in favor of the idea that students should be encouraged to participate in more extracurricular activities, not only because it can benefit their studies simultaneously, but also because it can help them develop more skills and abilities. Those students who can organically combine study and extracurricular activities will be the masters of their future.
- Xem thêm -

Tài liệu liên quan