VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI
VIETNAM JAPAN UNIVERSITY
LE MINH PHUONG
EFFECTS OF ASEAN FREE TRADE AREA
(AFTA) ON INTRA-REGIONAL TRADE
FLOWS: EVIDENCE FROM AUTOMOTIVE
INDUSTRY
MASTER'S THESIS
………………….
Master Program in Public Policy
Hanoi, 2020
VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI
VIETNAM JAPAN UNIVERSITY
LE MINH PHUONG
EFFECTS OF ASEAN FREE TRADE AREA
(AFTA) ON INTRA-REGIONAL TRADE
FLOWS: EVIDENCE FROM AUTOMOTIVE
INDUSTRY
MAJOR: MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY
CODE: PILOT
RESEARCH SUPERVISOR:
Assistant Prof. TRAN LAM ANH DUONG
Associate Prof. NGUYEN THI MINH
Hanoi, 2020
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The writing of a master’s thesis is not a comfortable task. So far, the biggest
accomplishment in my life is complete it. And, I would like to grab this chance to
express my immense thankfulness to all those persons who gave me their invaluable
support and assistance.
Above all, I am greatly indebted to my supervisors, Assistant Professor Tran Lam Anh
Duong who was very willing with her time and knowledge. She supported me from the
first steps of the research process. Not only instructing, but she also studied with me
from theory to analytical practice. And, Associate Professor Nguyen Thi Minh who gave
me valuable suggestions to help me overcome the most difficult periods. Without their
advice, I would definitely have ended up in chaos.
I would include those who helped me in finding data - Mrs. Nguyen Thi Xuan Thuy
from the Viet Nam Industry Agency (Ministry of Industry and Trade, Vietnam) and Dr.
Dang Quang Vinh from the Master’s program in Public Policy of Viet Nam Japan
University who assisted me during the final procedure.
Especially, I am grateful to all other lecturers Dr. Thuy Anh, Prof. Naohisa Okamoto,
Dr. Vu Hoang Linh who gave me helpful comments during one year of preparation for
the thesis. It is also appropriate to thank, MPP program assistants Ms. Ha and Ms. Huong
and staffs from the Office of Global Initiatives at the University of Tsukuba for
supporting me during two years studying at VJU and to undergo the memorable threemonth internship in Japan.
Last but not least, special thanks are reserved for my family and my friends for their
tireless efforts and spiritual support.
After all, I take full responsibility for any flaws, errors and omissions.
This thesis is dedicated to the memory of my father.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................... iii
LIST OF TABLES .........................................................................................................vi
LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... vii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................... viii
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION....................................................................................1
1.1 Background ............................................................................................................1
1.1.1 AFTA overview ................................................................................................ 1
1.1.2 ASEAN economics and trade overview ........................................................... 2
1.1.3 ASEAN automotive industry ............................................................................6
1.2 Definition .............................................................................................................13
1.3 Research objectives and research questions......................................................... 14
1.4 Hypotheses ...........................................................................................................15
1.5 Method and methodology ....................................................................................16
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW.......................................................................18
2.1 Theoretical framework of gravity model ............................................................. 18
2.2 Effects of AFTA on intra-regional trade flows at aggregated level..................... 20
2.3 Effects of AFTA on intra-regional trade at disaggregated level .......................... 21
CHAPTER 3: DATA AND METHOD .........................................................................24
3.1 The estimation methodology and model specification ........................................24
3.1.1 The estimation methodology ..........................................................................24
3.1.2 Model specification ........................................................................................ 27
3.3 Data description ...................................................................................................31
3.4 The estimation method and common issues of panel data in gravity model
estimation ...................................................................................................................33
3.5 Data processing ....................................................................................................37
CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS ............................................................................................. 38
4.1 Estimation results of trade creation and trade diversion effects by AFTA ..........38
4.1.1 Export flows ...................................................................................................38
4.1.2 Import flows ...................................................................................................40
4.2 Estimation results of trade creation effect by tariff elimination .......................... 41
4.2.1 Export flows ...................................................................................................41
4.2.2 Import flows ...................................................................................................43
4.3 Trade creation effect by tariff elimination by individual AFTA member countries
....................................................................................................................................44
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION ...................................................................................... 48
5.1 Research summary ............................................................................................... 48
5.2 Policy implication ................................................................................................ 49
5.3 Limitations of the thesis ....................................................................................... 50
5.4 Further research ....................................................................................................50
REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................51
Appendix 1. Average tariff under CEPT Scheme from 1993 to 2015 ....................... 55
Appendix 2. ASEAN Countries code table ................................................................ 57
Appendix 3. Regional trade agreements – AFTA and AFTA-plus-FTAs .................58
Appendix 4. Summary Statistic .................................................................................59
Appendix 5. The effects of AFTA on export trade flows by PPMLHDFE ...............61
Appendix 6. The effects of AFTA on import trade flows by PPMLHDFE ...............62
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1: Share of total trade on GDP (%) of ASEAN countries, 1993-2018 ..............3
Table 1.2: ASEAN-5 motor vehicle production (in units), 2006-2018 ........................... 7
Table 1.3: ASEAN-7 motor vehicle sales (in units), 2006-2018 ....................................8
Table 1.4: List of ASEAN countries by GDP (PPP) per capita ranked by the World
Bank (2018) ...................................................................................................................13
Table 2.1: The estimated coefficients of AFTA dummies from existing studies…….22
Table 3.1: Possible outcomes of trade effects in an AFTA ...........................................30
Table 3.2: Hypotheses of the estimated coefficients ..................................................... 30
Table 3.3: The availability of bilateral trade flows from UN Comtrade ....................... 32
Table 3.4: Description of multiple fixed effects models ...............................................36
Table 4.1: The effects of AFTA on export trade flows by REGHDFE ........................ 39
Table 4.2: The effects of AFTA on import trade flows by REGHDFE ........................ 40
Table 4.3: Trade creation effect by tariff elimination – Export flow by PPMLHDFE
method ........................................................................................................................... 42
Table 4.4: Trade creation effect by tariff elimination – Import flow by PPMLHDFE
method ........................................................................................................................... 43
Table 4.5: Estimation results of trade creation effect by tariff elimination ..................44
Table 4.6: Estimation results with country dummy – Export flow ............................... 46
Table 4.7: Estimation results with country dummy – Import flow ............................... 47
Table 5.1: Summary of trade creation and trade diversion effects ................................ 48
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Real GDP growth (annual %) of ASEAN region, 1980-2020 ......................2
Figure 1.2: Total value of exports and imports of goods and services in ASEAN, 20002017 (in US$ billion) .......................................................................................................4
Figure 1.3: Trend of ASEAN total trade, extra-ASEAN trade and intra-ASEAN trade,
1993-2013 ........................................................................................................................ 4
Figure 1.4: Share of export values of goods by intra-ASEAN and its major trading
partners (%), 2000-2017 ..................................................................................................5
Figure 1.5: Shares of export and import value of goods by ASEAN country, 2000-2017
(%) ...................................................................................................................................5
Figure 1.6: Trend of intra- and extra-ASEAN export of priority integration sector of
automotive products, 1993-2013 .....................................................................................6
Figure 1.7: Total automotive export and import value in ASEAN countries, 1993-2018
(in US$ million) ...............................................................................................................8
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ACFTA
ASEAN-China Free Trade Area
AEC
ASEAN Economic Community
AFTA
ASEAN Free Trade Area
AIFTA
ASEAN-India Free Trade Area
AJCEP
ASEAN-Japan Comprehensive Economic
Partnership
AKFTA
ASEAN-Korea Free Trade Area
APTA
Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement
ASEAN
Association of Southeast Asian Nations
ATIGA
ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement
CBU
Complete Built-Up
CEPT
Common Effective Preferential Tariff
CIA
Central Intelligence Agency
CKD
Completely Knocked Down
CLMV
Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar and Viet Nam
EL
Exclusion List
FDI
Foreign Direct Investment
FEM
Fixed Effect Model
FTA
Free Trade Agreement
GVC
Global Value Chain
HMR
Helpman, Melitz and Rubinstein
HS
Harmonized System
IL
Inclusion List
MFN
Most Favoured Nation
MNEs
Multinational Enterprises
NTBs
Non-Tariff Barriers
NTMs
Non-Tariff Measures
PPML
Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood
PPP
Purchasing Power Parity
PTA
Preferential Trade Agreement
SL
Sensitive List
TL
Temporary Exclusion List
REM
Random Effect Model
WDI
World Development Indicators
WTO
World Trade Organization
ZIPPML
Zero-inflated PPML
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
1.1.1 AFTA overview
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was established in 1967 with 5
original members, namely Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand.
Currently, the association consists of 10 member states, as successively Brunei
Darussalam, Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar (Burma) and Cambodia. In October 2003,
ASEAN leaders decided to create a single market for a huge economy of US$722 billion
and nearly 550 million people (2003). The building of the ASEAN Economic
Community (AEC) by the end of 2015 is a major milestone of integration effort
attempted in the developing world, offering variety of opportunities for each member
states to attract inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and increase trade flows. AEC
has been considered as successor following the completion of the ASEAN Free Trade
Area (AFTA), which was signed in 1992 in Singapore by 6 original ASEAN countries.
At that time, the AFTA agreement aimed to eliminate the tariff on a wide range of
products between ASEAN members.
The establishment of AFTA has attracted the remaining members, Vietnam has been
joined since 1995, Laos and Myanmar (1997), Cambodia (1999). Under the Common
Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) Scheme, the products are firstly classified into two
different groups depending on the willingness of each member - Inclusion List (IL) and
Exclusion List (EL). Those product under IL were subject to removal of tariff to between
0% and 5% by 2008 for original AFTA members. Later on, the tariff reduction schedule
was revised several times. Finally, the end year of IL was moved to 2002. The EL was
later devided into a Temporary Exclusion List (TL) and Sensitive List (SL). Those
products in TL would be shifted to IL in the future. Whereas, additional time for both
IL and TL were given to the newer member countries, namely Cambodia, Laos,
Myanmar and Vietnam (CLMV) to implement their private routine of tariff reduction
for products which originate from within AFTA members. In addition, non-tariff
measures (NTMs) or non-tariff barriers (NTBs) were excluded under the CEPT scheme.
However, since 2010 the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA) has come into
effect to enhance and supersede the CEPT/AFTA with greater goal ambiguity covering
both tariff and non-tariff elimination.
1
The creation of AFTA (or ATIGA) has generated a bigger internal market that each
member is able to entry into lower trade cost market and attract more investment into
their economy that allow producing on a large scale.
1.1.2 ASEAN economics and trade overview
Nowadays, the ASEAN region has become well known in the world due to its high real
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth in a long period of time.
Figure 1.1: Real GDP growth (annual %) of ASEAN region, 1980-2020
Source: IMF DataMapper
Firgue 1.1 illustrates the real GDP growth rate of the ASEAN region compared to the
group of advanced economies and the average across the whole world from 1980 to
2020 (estimated data). ASEAN’s real GDP growth have increased remarkably, except
during two crisis periods: the Asian financial crisis in 1998 and the Global crisis in 2008.
The average growth rate of GDP in the whole period 1980-2018 of three groups ASEAN,
advanced economies and the average of the world is 5.3%, 2.2% and 3.3% respectively.
Followed by that data, the average value of this important indicator reveals that ASEAN
is one of the fastest growing economies in the world.
2
On the other hand, trade to GDP ratios measure the relative importance of international
trade in each ASEAN economy. Table 1.1 below shows the trade to GDP ratios or
openness indicator of 10 ASEAN countries. In general, almost ASEAN countries open
its economy to the world, partially due to its economic integration efforts. The high trade
openness which trade to GDP ratios is greater than 100 percent bringing many economic
benefits, from increasing technology transfer, supplying more job, enhancing the total
factor productivity for the economic development. It seems that the smaller economies
in land area and GDP than trade more and vice versa. That can be seen from the table
1.1, for example Singapore is the most dynamic economy in ASEAN in comparison
with Indonesia which is the largest country in both land area and GDP in ASEAN region.
Table 1.1: Share of total trade on GDP (%) of ASEAN countries, 1993-2018
Singapore
Malaysia
Viet Nam
Cambodia
Thailand
Brunei Darussalam
Lao PDR
Philippines
Indonesia
Myanmar
357
175
149
125
118
102
90
84
55
15
Source: Author’s calculations based on WITS country profile data
From the calculation formula of GDP by expenditure approach, the rapid of expansion
in GDP of ASEAN region has been definitely contributed by export-import component1.
The entire value of trade in goods and services in this region has been playing an
important role in GDP measurement under expenditure approach.
By looking at the figure 1.2, the total merchandise trade of ASEAN region has sharply
increased from 2000 to 2017 equivalent to an increase of nearly 3.5 times (ASEAN
Secretariat, 2018).
1
The formula for GDP by expenditure approach: GDP = C + I + G + (X-M)
3
Figure 1.2: Total value of exports and imports of goods and services in ASEAN,
2000-2017 (in US$ billion)
According to report of ASEAN Secretariat (2014) in the special edition “the removal of
trade barriers has been centered on the removal of intra-ASEAN tariffs through
commitment CEPT under the AFTA”. Although, figures in trade indicates that “ASEAN
depended a great deal on the consumption and production needs of the rest of the world”
(Mahfuz Kabir et al., 2014), but intra-ASEAN trade still has been increased dramatically,
even though faster than overall ASEAN trade and extra-ASEAN trade. From 1993 to
2013, the intra-ASEAN trade has surged by more than 7 times, while extra-ASEAN
trade has increased more than 5 times.
Figure 1.3: Trend of ASEAN total trade, extra-ASEAN trade and intra-ASEAN trade,
1993-2013
4
Regarding to a very fast increasing in intra-regional trade and the success of trade
surplus in ASEAN region, from 2000 to 2017 intra-ASEAN collectively is the largest
market.
Figure 1.4: Share of export values of goods by intra-ASEAN and its major trading
partners (%), 2000-2017
Overall, there is a significant gap in trade by export and import value among 10 ASEAN
countries. Singapore is the largest exporter, followed by Thailand, Malaysia, Viet Nam,
Indonesia and Philippines. Meanwhile, Brunei Darussalam, Laos, Cambodia and
Myanmar are among trade less countries.
Figure 1.5: Shares of export and import value of goods by ASEAN country, 20002017 (%)
5
Specially, according to ASEAN Community in Figure reported in 2014, ASEAN records
a surplus in its trade of agro-based products, rubber-based products, wood-based
products, fisheries products, textile products, electronic products and automotive
products with its major trading partners, although the surplus was relatively small, in
general. According to the report, in the case of automotive products, including both final
and intermediate products, by 2013 ASEAN achieved a small surplus with Australia and
New Zealand, and USA. Meanwhile, trade deficit was large with Japan, small in the
case of China, Republic of Korea, and EU-28.
Figure 1.6: Trend of intra- and extra-ASEAN export of priority integration sector of
automotive products, 1993-2013
1.1.3 ASEAN automotive industry
Regarding to the trade value of automotive industry in ASEAN, this region has remained a
net importer despite its export value is closely catching up with import value. Remarkably,
the value of extra-ASEAN export in the case of automotive was 2 times that of intraASEAN export compared to other industries those was 7 to 15 times (ASEAN Secretariat,
2014). This figures imply that intra-regional trade flows of automobile are increasingly
significant important. However, ASEAN still import mainly from neighboring ASEAN
countries such as China, Japan, South Korea, etc.
Further, according to the ASEAN Investment Report (ASEAN Secretariat, 2020), steady
economic growth, increasing in middle-class consumer, deepening regional integration
ASEAN has attracted more the Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) increasing their value
chain participation in automotive industry.
6
Therefore, AFTA was expected to accelerate easier obtaining and more efficient intraregional and intra-industry trading, creating an environment that is advantageous to
achieve economies of scale in automobiles and its components.
Table 1.2: ASEAN-5 motor vehicle production (in units), 2006-2018
Country
2008
2010
Indonesia
296,008
600,844
702,508 1,065,557
Malaysia
503,048
530,810
567,715
569,620
596,418
545,253
564,971
12
63,621
80,477
75,413
88,845
116,868
79,763
25
1,880,007 1,944,417 2,167,694
82
Philippines
Thailand
Viet Nam
2012
2014
1,188,044 1,394,029 1,645,304 2,453,717
35,087
107,918
106,166
2016
2018
% Change
2006
1,298,523 1,177,389 1,343,714
73,673
121,084
236,161
200,436
2006-2018
354
471
Note: Data for other countries are not available
Source: ASEAN Automotive Federation
According to figure collected from the ASEAN Automotive Federation, five largest
economies in producing automobile are Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, and
Viet Nam produced totally over 44 million units of motor vehicles from 2006 to 2018.
Meanwhile, at the national level, Thailand accounts for 52%, Indonesia (27%), Malaysia
(16%), Viet Nam (4%) and the Philippines (2%). It can be stated that Thailand continues to
play a dominant role in the ASEAN automotive industry. These countries are expected to
continue to grow and become an important role in the global value chain (Kobayashi, 2014).
Korwatanasakul, U., and Intarakumnerd, P. (2020) in the report about the global value
chains in automobiles in ASEAN also emphasized that the automobile industry has been
an important driving force in ASEAN, contributing at least $177 billion to ASEAN’s
GDP every year and creating about 2.4 million jobs.
Overall, ASEAN is considered as an important production hub for the entire automobile
sector, including automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, and their parts becoming a “factory
of Asia”. Therefore, the analysis of trade flows in automotive industry among ASEAN
countries is necessary in this context of trade globalization.
7
Table 1.3: ASEAN-7 motor vehicle sales (in units), 2006-2018
% Change
Country
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
Brunei
12,522
14,680
13,589
18,634
18,114
13,248
11,226
(10)
Indonesia
318,904 603,774 764,710 1,116,212 1,208,019 1,061,735 1,151,291
261
Malaysia
490,768 548,115 605,156
627,753
666,465
580,124
598,714
22
99,541 124,449 168,490
156,654
234,747
359,572
357,410
259
110,455
95,243
(31)
Philippines
Singapore
137,564 110,574
37,247
47,443
Thailand
682,161 615,270 800,357 1,436,335
881,832
768,788 1,041,739
53
133,588
270,820
606
Viet Nam
51,891
2006-2018
40,897 110,186 111,737
80,453
288,683
Note: Data for other countries are not available
Source: ASEAN Automotive Federation
During the period 2006-2018, more than 36 million units of motor vehicles have been
sold in the ASEAN market of more than 650 million of population. Indonesia and
Thailand are biggest important markets account for 62% in total, followed by Malaysia,
the Philippines and Viet Nam. Contrarily, sales in Brunei and Singapore is very lower,
even though these two countries are among richest ones. The possible reason is that
because these countries have smaller scale of population.
Figure 1.7: Total automotive export and import value in ASEAN countries, 19932018 (in US$ million)
Note: Lack of data for Cambodia, Lao, Myanmar, the Philippines, Viet Nam and Malaysia
8
Source: Author’s collection and calculation from UN Comtrade source
Brunei Darussalam is a small country in land area. Its population is only 428,962 (World
Bank) in 2018. From 1990 to 2012, its real GDP has significantly increased 50% before
decreasing slowly due to the Global Financial Crisis. Brunei was early ranked among
industrialized countries by high GDP per capita at purchasing power parity. In 2018
World Bank ranked Brunei as the fifth-richest nation out of 182 countries, based on its
petroleum and natural gas fields. Crude oil and natural gas production of Brunei account
for approximately 65% of GDP and 95% of exports, with Japan as the primary export
market. According to Korwatanasakul, U., and Intarakumnerd, P. (2020), Brunei
Darussalam is the only ASEAN country that has not directly involved in the automotive
value chain. However, Brunei was explored developing assembly plant for electric and
renewable energy-powered vehicles in 2016. Besides, the total export value involving
automotive industry of this country from 1993 to 2018 was lowest among ASEAN
countries, only 162 million USD.
Cambodia has experienced strong economic growth since 1996. Its GDP grew an
average annual rate of over 8% between 2000 and 2010 and about over 7% since 2011.
Its main industries are tourism, garment, textile, construction and real estate. So far
Cambodia remains one of the poorest countries in the world was ranked at 138th
measuring by GDP (PPP) per capita, only 4,000 USD for one people per year. Besides,
the total automotive export and import value of Cambodia is also among lowest
countries compared to other ASEAN ones. The automobile industry in Cambodia
mainly engages in Complete Built-Up (CBU) production through Completely Knocked
Down (CKD) kits. Cambodia’s automotive industry still is in its early stages, it could
raise their competitiveness base on advantages of cheap and large labor force in near
future. Typically, this country could have been benefiting from “China-Plus-One” and
“Thailand-Plus-One” strategies, which mainly extended the automobile production of
Tier-2 suppliers in China and Thailand to the CLM countries (Korwatanasakul, U., and
Intarakumnerd, P., 2020).
Lao PDR is the only landlocked country surrounded by Myanmar, China, Viet Nam and
Thailand. Due to its central geographical location, Laos became a hub for overland trade.
Initially, Lao PDR has been one of the memberships of Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement
9
(APTA) previously known as the Bankok Agreement was signed in 19752. Its population
estimates at 7 million people in 2018. As Cambodia, Laos still is poor country ranked at
124th nation according to GDP (PPP) per capita in the world. The automobile and parts
and components industries of the Laos are the least developed among the CLMV
countries. CKD assembly plants have not been established. However, under the Greater
Mekong Sub-region Economic Cooperation and Thailand-plus-one strategy, the Lao
PDR is one of the key countries for suppling labor at a relatively low cost for the
automotive value chain.
Myanmar (Burma) has been seen as a dynamic economy in the world with the average
annual rate of GDP growth at roughly 9.2% from 1992 to 2018. Its population is about
53.7 million people. Since 2011, Myanmar has experienced a comprehensive reform in
economy and politics Although Myanmar still has lots of challenges to catch up other
countries in ASEAN, this country is expected to receive lots of benefits from its
abundance of cheap and big labor force and natural resources as well.
Thailand is one of early industrialized countries in ASEAN region. Its economy highly
depends on international trade, with exports accounting for 66% of GDP. The main
export sector of this country focus on electronics, agricultural commodities, automobiles
and parts, and processed foods. The country has experienced over the past 50 years
developing automotive industry from early 1960s under the regime of import
substitution and a revision of the country’s investment promotion law to attract
automotive assembly to Thailand. Especially, in the late 1980s, due to the appreciation
of the Japanese yen raised the production costs of automobile in Japan. There was a
massive rise in FDI inflows and MNEs contribution to Thailand for both carmakers and
parts suppliers. Nowadays, Thailand’s automobile was ranked 1st among ASEAN
countries, 3rd in the Asian continent and 12th in the world.
Indonesia is the largest economy in the region. This country consists of a thousand
islands and ranked at 4th in the world’s population. As an emerging economy Indonesia
has experienced a high economic growth in a long period with the average at 6.8%
(1968-1996) and 5.3% (2000-2018). During the Asian financial crisis, the country’s
2
The member of Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement (APTA) include Bangladesh, China, India, Lao PDR,
Mongolia, Republic of Korea, and Sri Lanka.
10
GDP growth decreased dramatically to -13% in 1998. Indonesia is also a huge domestic
market and enable to supply employment for a half of population with the labor force of
more than 125 million people for domestic producing. Besides, a huge domestic market
makes Indonesian automotive manufacturers mainly focus on producing complete
automobiles and export mostly its parts and components to the world. Japanese
producers have contributed significantly to the development of Indonesia’s automobiles
as Thailand.
Malaysia performs impressively in GDP growth from 1963 after gaining independence
from Britain. From 1960s to 2018, tts GDP grew by an average of 6.4% per year. The
economic growth peaked in almost 10 years (1988-1997) with the average of 9.3% per
year just before falling in 1998. Nowadays, Malaysia is an upper middle-income country
with GDP per capita at PPP is above 30,000 US$. Their first national car project was
launched in 1983, which produced a successful car brand for domestic market. As
Thailand, exports and imports in automotive industry of Malaysia have increasingly
contributed to the intra-regional trade flows.
The Philippines is a country which participated early in the auto assembly industry since
1950s. As other ASEAN countries, the motor vehicle industry is principally contributed
and dominated by Japanese automobile manufacturers. However, as of figure of motor
vehicle production, from 2006 to 2018, the Philippines accounts only 2% on the whole
total production of ASEAN region, ranked at 5th largest producers. In terms of sales, due
to a small domestic automobile market, more than 2.5 million car units were sold in
more than 10 years accounting for 8%. Since 2007, this country has been increasing its
competitiveness by promoting investment activities inward automobile.
Vietnam’ economy has impressed the intra-regional and extra-regional investors by its
high economic growth and relatively stable politics. In 1989, this country shifted from
a centrally planned to a market. Nowadays, Vietnam is among the most dynamic
emerging countries in Asia in general with the average of annual GDP rate at 6.8% per
year from 1989 to 2018. Also, Vietnam entered into production of automobile from early
1990s. In 1995, the first automotive factories were built in this country, knock-down
kits to produce vehicles, starting with Japanese car brand. However, by 2018 Vietnam
still is one of the most protector for domestic manufacturing by high tariffs and non11
- Xem thêm -